88 Comments
User's avatar
NB's avatar

If only men voted, the Democrats would never win an election. The liberal party in Canada would never win an election. The AFD in Germany would be in power. The national front in France would be in power. The reform party in the UK would be in power. Etc. etc. etc. Women voting is the absolute plague to society.

Expand full comment
Morag's avatar
4dEdited

This woman agrees with you and has long considered the suffragettes to have been the precursors to our contemporary radical feminazis (as Rush would call them).

All of whom have eaten from the same poisonous Tree that so captivated our first mother, Eve.

The problem is that it's the gifts from our Creator which so irritate us (being insufficient to the job of bringing us constant joy) that our bile overcomes us and we cope by hitting back at Him -- and our men folk are far more ready at hand as targets to receive our abuse. If only modern women would turn off CNN and tune out the Winfry woman, for example, and just for laughs, pick up Martin Luther's explanation of the First of the Ten Commandments, which can be found in The Book of Concord.

After all, it was she/Eve who doubted the True Lover of her soul, and instead fell for the sugar-coated lies of the Evil One: like now.

Expand full comment
Chris Collins's avatar

Your so right here. Just have a look into what that grubby winfri woman is up to today, especially in Hawaii with her new bunker she's building to go and hide, but, that won't save her from the all mighty. Is, or was, anybody on the face of this Earth worth getting paid $600m a year to gossip about other people's problems?, i don't think so. She also claimed years ago in the early days, that she had a hard up bringing, abusive father, etc, yet, went to a private school. Hard life indeed. We should all be that abused.

Expand full comment
Darius's avatar

and if election machines didn't vote . . . . . .

Expand full comment
Stephen Due's avatar

The disastrous effects can also be seen in the feminisation of the workforce, and especially in government/public service. Somehow feelgood public policy always ends up feeling very bad.

Expand full comment
The Great Resist's avatar

As I woman, I can say that, in general (with a few notable exceptions), female politicians are an even bigger disaster. Not that greedy globalist male politicians are much better, but the screeching harpies of the DemonRat party need to sit down and shut up.

Expand full comment
Alexander Scipio's avatar

All current social pathologies in the west are downstream from empathy voters: “Oh, that poor ____ we must help them!” Illegal aliens, incarcerated thugs, street thugs, crappy teachers, fatherless boys….

The purpose of mythology is to teach and propagate the values and experience of societies: Eve, Pandora & Brunhilde all were female for a reason.

No matriarchies exist in the historical record; there’s a reason for that, too.

Civilization … OR … suffrage. It’s a binary choice.

Expand full comment
Musta Koira's avatar

I like your first paragraph. Your second paragraph may serve as a warning although demonization of women has been too general. Unfortunately, both sexes have platformed the ridiculous antics of women over at least the last 15 years. The Navajo society is matriarchal according to a number of references. Women learned to drive; I'm sure they can learn to think as well.

Expand full comment
Alexander Scipio's avatar

they haven’t in the century since 19A…

Expand full comment
Tardigrade's avatar

Because before women could vote, governments worked so well.

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

Right on!!

Expand full comment
Dave Scrimshaw's avatar

Gangster racketeering is what the world's governments are all about . United States Marine Corps general Smedley Butler famously said (& wrote): War Is a Racket. In fact, the leaders of the world (past & present) seem to have a lot in common with Don Vito Corleone. For example WW1 - Queen Victoria & her grandson, the Kaiser - keep it all in la familia. And your observation about Churchill reminds me how similar he was to Teddy (Roosevelt). If there is one thing the study of history has taught me, is that mankind learns NOTHING from history.

Expand full comment
Morag's avatar

Mankind does not and cannot change -- this side of heaven.

So what chance does our history have?

Individuals can change, but only so much.

The most we can hope for is being simul justus et peccator.

Justified though still a sinner.

Expand full comment
Dave Scrimshaw's avatar

agreed

Expand full comment
Frances Lynch's avatar

Awful; it's a feature, not a bug.

What is being done in the UK is the plan for all of the EU, and if the WEF crowd get their way, the world. And the US is now on one hell of a slippery slope.

The midterms are going to be a real hoot for MAGA did not sign up for MIGA.

Expand full comment
Chris Collins's avatar

Maybe???, however, have you noticed lately, the younger generation are starting to wake up to the WEF etc, so, i live in hope for them to bring these pricks down sooner or later, and i believe they will, from within.

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

The younger ones are indeed awakening!!!

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

I didn't sign up for MIGA.

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

best jew government money can buy.

Expand full comment
Frances Lynch's avatar

I see it as the Deep State of several nations using Jews as a cover for seizing control of governments, the Middle East and most of the EU.

Do rank andfile jews benefit from this, not especially. It only serves to make them paranoid, fearful and Captive donors/voters to a ruthless, faceless group that cares nothing for anything but power.

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

I don't know. I draw my conclusions from watching videos of what jews say over many years and reading what they've written in their own words in the Talmud about the goyim. As well as their actions, USS Liberty, Pollard, Rosenbergs Et Al and the warnings from prominent non jews over centuries.

Expand full comment
Frances Lynch's avatar

I may be wrong, but a clever covert agency would use videos of unwitting dupes as well as the written rantings of a paranoid and isolated tribal culture to their political and tactical advantage.

Actions such as the USS Liberty; a US/Israeli planned FF to justify an attack on Iran, and 9/11 which was also a US/Israeli FF to justify destroying 7 nations in the Middle East, all point to far greater goals than just protecting Israel.

I see Israel as a puppet state used to mask globalists efforts to control the Middle East, and via their Middle East control Russia and Russia's near abroad. Plus if the can take out Iran, they dramatically reduce Chinese access to gas, oil.

It's a play to control the world, a redux of England's Great Game, just this time, the US is the muscle. Again, I may be entirely wrong in seeing Jews as pawns, willing yes, but pawns.

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

You're bloody idiotic.

Expand full comment
Caroline Ayers's avatar

Its the impoverishment of the British people...not their dumbing down that is happening... they can see it happening but are powerless to stop it as we seem to have a uniparty... I think the forces at play are far larger than a few bad decisions by a few bad British leaders... and I think a lot of the malign stuff comes straight out of US organisations like DARPA, DOD, etc and has been enthusiastically adopted by globalists in the UK...

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

I agree.

Expand full comment
Roger's avatar
4dEdited

I recommend these two books to everyone. Forgive me if I have done it here before.

Hidden History, and

Prolonging the Agony

by Docherty

document how a small cabal of Brits (King James, Milner, Churchill, and others) conspired to instigate WW1 and blame it on Germany. They wanted to thoroughly destroy the up and coming competing German Empire. So they created the alliances, started the war, then prolonged the agony. The war should have ended in 6 mos with a competent blockade by the British navy. But Admiral Churchill deliberately made their blockade ineffectual. After the war Hoover went around Europe under the cover of foreign aide to secure any documentation that might blow their story that the Germans instigated the war. So then of course, the first WW created the conditions for the second WW. Churchill should rot in hell.

EDIT: Sorry, not up on my British royal fops. It was King Edward VII who conspired until he passed in 1910.

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

Along with the Frenchies and their Versailles Treaty.

Expand full comment
Roger's avatar

That was a group cluster-fnck by all the powers, including the USA.

Expand full comment
Eric Larsen's avatar

Thanks for the book recommendations. Interesting stuff, if horrifying, when one considers the millions lost and untold suffering on that continent and for what today, where they allow themselves to be invaded and degraded by hostile migrant groups and are quickly becoming a type of socialist-Islamist dystopian Disneyland.

Expand full comment
Roger's avatar

The British Empire, to this day, is the USA's and the world's succubus, evil vampires. They are even doing it to their own homebase. Watch and read Mat Ehret's stuff on the Malthusian oligarchs.

Expand full comment
Morag's avatar

I must be missing something here.

The King James I know (James 2) was driven (1688) from his kingdom for his brutal excesses in trying to stifle the rascally Protestants who, remembering the egregious antics of bad-'ol Bloody Mary (d. 1558), were not about to tolerate another Popish monarch gathering kindling for yet another round of "fireworks" aimed at religious opponents.

Expand full comment
Roger's avatar

I edited my post. It was King Edward VII who conspired until he passed in 1910.

Expand full comment
Morag's avatar

Wasn't he the philandering son of Queen Victoria?

It appears that monarchs are every bit the profligate sinners the rest of us are.

Or as the Bible states: "There is no one righteous, no not one." Book of Romans, ch 3.

Expand full comment
Roger's avatar

There is some nasty stuff even about QE2 that has been covered up. Abducted African children. Was she mainlining adrenochrome?

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

Oh, Oh, another Catholic hater. Blame Henry VIII.

Expand full comment
Kay's avatar

You don’t have to hate Catholics to hate burning people at the stake. Protestants did it too.

Expand full comment
Mike's avatar

Another government overrun by satanic globalists with a long running record of ill intent. They need to repent or burn.

Expand full comment
PaPa's avatar
4dEdited

Source: ChatGPT: Timeline of British Financial & Strategic Influence Leading to the Post-WWII Hijacking of America.

This timeline traces the causal links from the founding of the Bank of England in 1694—a war-financing machine—to the post-WWII British hijacking of U.S. intelligence and foreign policy.

1694 – The Bank of England Is Founded • Created as a private central bank to finance Britain's wars.

• Establishes the debt-based monetary system, where the Crown and Parliament borrow from private bankers to wage global conflicts. • Sets the precedent for using financial control to drive geopolitical strategy. 18th & 19th Centuries – British Global Financial Empire • The Bank of England funds colonial expansion, naval dominance, and war efforts (e.g., Napoleonic Wars). • The Rothschild banking network emerges as a key financier of European conflicts and British imperial control. • British intelligence and financial institutions begin developing global influence operations—the early seeds of future “deep state” tactics.

1913 – The Federal Reserve Is Established in the U.S. • Modeled on the Bank of England, the Fed becomes a private central bank controlling U.S. monetary policy. • Created after secret meetings on Jekyll Island, influenced by British and European banking elites. • Marks the beginning of U.S. financial subservience to the Anglo-American banking network.

1914–1918 – World War I & the U.S.-UK Financial Alliance • The U.S. enters WWI in 1917, largely at the urging of British intelligence (Zimmermann Telegram, propaganda). • Britain, drowning in war debt, begins integrating U.S. financial and military power into its global strategy. • Post-war: U.S. replaces Britain as the world’s largest creditor, but Britain retains control over global financial mechanisms (City of London, BIS).

1920s–1930s – British Influence Over American Institutions Grows • Council on Foreign Relations (CFR) established (1921), modeled after Chatham House (RIIA), ensuring U.S. foreign policy aligns with British interests. • Wall Street and the Bank of England manipulate global financial markets, leading to the 1929 Great Depression, which consolidates elite banking control over national economies. • British intelligence networks infiltrate American academia, media, and government (e.g., Rhodes Scholars, Pilgrims Society).

1939–1945 – World War II: Britain Uses the U.S. to Save Its Empire • Britain, financially and militarily exhausted, maneuvers the U.S. into WWII (e.g., Churchill’s backchannel diplomacy, Pearl Harbor provocations). • British intelligence (e.g., William Stephenson, MI6) embeds itself in U.S. agencies, shaping wartime strategy. • Post-war: The British realize they can no longer maintain global dominance alone, so they fully integrate U.S. power into their grand strategy.

1945–1947 – The “Special Relationship” Becomes the British Takeover of U.S. Foreign Policy • OSS disbanded, CIA created (1947), but British intelligence officers and doctrine deeply influence its structure. • The Truman Doctrine & Cold War narrative ensure that the U.S. becomes the new enforcer of global Anglo-American interests. • The U.S. and UK establish the Five Eyes intelligence alliance, cementing long-term British influence over American surveillance and espionage. 1953–Present – America Becomes the Military Arm of the British Financial Empire •

1953: The U.S. and UK stage a coup in Iran (Operation Ajax) to protect British Petroleum. •

1954: Guatemala coup (Operation PBSUCCESS), following British colonial counterinsurgency tactics.

1960s–Present: U.S. foreign policy is dominated by British-influenced intelligence operations, proxy wars, and financial warfare. • Globalization and Neoliberalism: The U.S. enforces a global financial system that traces back to the Bank of England's war-financing model, ensuring perpetual debt-driven conflict.

Causal Conclusion: The Bank of England (1694) established a financial model of war-driven economic control. That model evolved into the Anglo-American banking & intelligence alliance, where Britain leveraged U.S. power post-WWII to continue its global strategy under a new imperial structure. The U.S. became the military and economic enforcer of a system Britain originally designed—one rooted in financial dominance, intelligence manipulation, and perpetual war. The British didn’t just hijack America after WWII—they built the system that made it inevitable.

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

Rothschilds are still around. They are waiting for the Ukrainian thing to get really ripe.

Expand full comment
Frank Wood, Jr.'s avatar

It is interesting that the blackmailing of Wilson was not included in the reading material fed to ChatGPT. Please ask your AI buddy about Samuel Untermeyer and a packet of letters written by Woodrow. It is alleged that the reward for bringing the USA into WWI was the Balfour Declaration.

Expand full comment
PaPa's avatar

I encourage all to have conversations with an AI tool (ChatGPT, DeepSeek, etc). Asking questions is key. My go to question for newbies is: "1694 - the Bank of England was founded. War and conflicts ever since. Causation?"

I have yet to find a single person that assigns any significance to the year 1694 - that reveals something.

I will inquire about Samuel Untermeyer. I copy my conversations to a Word document and file for reference.

Expand full comment
Rascal Nick Of's avatar

British patriots need to make “net zero” the number of their globalist oligarchs. Things are ripening up for revolution there. Depose the king as in the Olden Tymes.

Expand full comment
Chris Collins's avatar

The writing is definitely on the wall, that's for sure.

Expand full comment
Stuffysays's avatar

The British public know full well that their politicians are charlatans and scoundrels. The question is how to get rid of them. Vote out one bunch and see them replaced with a different set of scoundrels.

(I always quite liked Clement Attlee - he wasn't in it for himself)

Expand full comment
Star Ibis's avatar

Thank you, again, John, for all the clarity of the current situation in England. Yet as I read the comments, I see the battle of the sexes still going strong. As a voting female, who does not take voting for granted, I watch to see how action is taken by politicians who run for office. Down through the decades, there were times I did not vote..thoroughly disgusted by both contenders. What happened to educating a human being to self govern? I want someone to recall, also, that after WWII, our government subtly encouraged women to work as more taxes went into the treasury from that. Of course businesses want households to purchase toasters, blenders, washers, dryers, refrigerators, cars, furniture, etc. Unfortunately they kept bringing in babies, that were then not nurtured too well and because of the conditioning that a husband wanted/needed a son..well some kept trying to give the guy a son when the means to support 4 or five kids was not there..at all!

Blaming the chaos on the women is not cool! Yet I will state that when a child does not receive sound nurturing, grounded love and decently good nutritious food..he or she may lack the ability to feel secure and very seldom can step into the world with confidence. This comes from both parents. And I will assume that most know that Britain holds the banner that started the industrial revolution which took men out of their homes and communities which created the breaking up of the family circle.

Wars took many able bodied and fine young men to their early deaths, as these men would have never put up with the crap that the elites had going on. So wars were a way of getting rid of good men. I cannot get started on what big pharma has been doing for decades concerning getting people to take their pills...not only does it affect the female uterus and eggs yet also the male's sperm. The human being has definitely been on a purposely driven devolution. And not to forget the banks..they could turn alot of this chicanery around yet so many are steeped in the trappings of money that they do not do it. It can get despairing however goodness in everyday life still exists which keeps many of us still smiling g, laughing, and enjoying the small pleasures that are still affordable.

Expand full comment
TE's avatar

Excellent piece and thanks for the history lesson.

Expand full comment
URsomoney's avatar

The city of London is separate & apart from the UK & its laws. They care nothing for the citizens as we are seeing our “elite” care nothing for US citizens & have sold us out every which way they can for their sole benefit. None of this is new & there is a ton of history written about the global mafia manipulating their own & other countries - the UK has just been doing it the longest. Churchill is not the “great man” we were told. You can even go back to his actual writings & see his true intentions.

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

He was a warmongering pig.

Expand full comment
URsomoney's avatar

They don’t want us to know that…or that WW2 was funded/produced by the elites for their own wealth & power. Should we really be surprised by the manufactured war in Ukraine? They’ve been doing this rodeo for 100+ years.

Expand full comment
wilson's avatar

like always the self appointed "elites" take no risk and profit. Smedley Butler was right and no one seems to care.

Expand full comment
David O'Halloran's avatar

Thanks for this. Very true. These are just some of the reasons I left 30 years back. I think you are right about the ignorant brainwashed state of the British - not all - but most. Propaganda is universal in that land.

Expand full comment
NB's avatar

Ever since women started voting, western society, all over the world has gone completely straight to shit

Expand full comment
John Marochi's avatar

Precisely!!

Expand full comment
Rick Zammuto's avatar

I am sadly convinced with too much data that the UK and Canada are the worst countries on the planet! The so-called politicians of both are nothing but mass-murdering, lying, mafia 100% of the time!

Expand full comment
Kathleen Woollcott's avatar

Sounds like Carney Canada.

Expand full comment