Appreciate your answer Jim. As I said, I only touched the surface. Furin cleavage was too obvious for me to mention.
There is a different flag which I don't see you deal with. Why lockdowns? Why "one single source of truth constantly demonising non-compliers? What was the point of creating a population responding from negative emotional d…
Appreciate your answer Jim. As I said, I only touched the surface. Furin cleavage was too obvious for me to mention.
There is a different flag which I don't see you deal with. Why lockdowns? Why "one single source of truth constantly demonising non-compliers? What was the point of creating a population responding from negative emotional diarrhoea?
The answer is in pubmed. In order for the spike to properly open and cause maximum infection, the body must have experienced prolonged ROS. Lots of studies on this, but some which talk about it are PMID: 37155555, and earlier one PMID: 34780781 - and PMID: 24114007 which shows that prolonged ROS creates hypercoagulability. They needed all that, so that when covid and the prodrug started, maximum "hits" were possible.
And again, that is just the tip of one of the many icebergs.
The point is that they KNEW what was required beforehand, and they implemented those plans well before-hand, startin in October 2019, which is another flag indicating that this was indeed a planned bioweapon.
So that is where we disagree. I agree with Mike Yeadon - you don't create something like this unless you have a plan to use it - and not on bats.
I also agree with the Japanese, that Omicron was also a deliberate release of "directly evolution" (aka Jordan Trishton Walker, Pfizer, "Director of research and development, strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning."), particularly that it was first noted near a Puerto Rican Pfizer facility in 2020, long before it's first "detection" in Sth Africa in November 2021, when it was brought in by vaccinated diplomats from Europe. Quite "how", no-one knows....
Their real plan will take a miracle to be known. That said, I can't go along with the term "dual use research of concern'. That is a sanitised phrase, like calling someone who has died, a "metabolically challenged person".
To me, it's a strategic bioweapon. And I also believe that the Danish study which divides their batches into "saline", "mild" and "severe" to also be a deliberate strategy.
After all, if all doses were equal, and all of them were bad, the results would have been so revealing that pulled wool wouldn't be possible... yet today, so many people still have the wool pulled over their eyes.
IMO it's a very careful multilayered plan with as many mazes and bunny trails as possible so that all we see are puffs of smoke, and no gun.
All designed to con people into the next phase....
The creation of Covid and coverup was intentional. Lockdowns were probably self-guilt. These animal vaccines (2-5 years FDA approval) were a pathway to human vaccines (20 years). Why the creators of Covid also created the jabs. Omicron probably from NA wt deer, which US virologists use to model contagious vaccines:
Appreciate your answer Jim. As I said, I only touched the surface. Furin cleavage was too obvious for me to mention.
There is a different flag which I don't see you deal with. Why lockdowns? Why "one single source of truth constantly demonising non-compliers? What was the point of creating a population responding from negative emotional diarrhoea?
The answer is in pubmed. In order for the spike to properly open and cause maximum infection, the body must have experienced prolonged ROS. Lots of studies on this, but some which talk about it are PMID: 37155555, and earlier one PMID: 34780781 - and PMID: 24114007 which shows that prolonged ROS creates hypercoagulability. They needed all that, so that when covid and the prodrug started, maximum "hits" were possible.
And again, that is just the tip of one of the many icebergs.
The point is that they KNEW what was required beforehand, and they implemented those plans well before-hand, startin in October 2019, which is another flag indicating that this was indeed a planned bioweapon.
So that is where we disagree. I agree with Mike Yeadon - you don't create something like this unless you have a plan to use it - and not on bats.
I also agree with the Japanese, that Omicron was also a deliberate release of "directly evolution" (aka Jordan Trishton Walker, Pfizer, "Director of research and development, strategic operations and mRNA scientific planning."), particularly that it was first noted near a Puerto Rican Pfizer facility in 2020, long before it's first "detection" in Sth Africa in November 2021, when it was brought in by vaccinated diplomats from Europe. Quite "how", no-one knows....
Their real plan will take a miracle to be known. That said, I can't go along with the term "dual use research of concern'. That is a sanitised phrase, like calling someone who has died, a "metabolically challenged person".
To me, it's a strategic bioweapon. And I also believe that the Danish study which divides their batches into "saline", "mild" and "severe" to also be a deliberate strategy.
After all, if all doses were equal, and all of them were bad, the results would have been so revealing that pulled wool wouldn't be possible... yet today, so many people still have the wool pulled over their eyes.
IMO it's a very careful multilayered plan with as many mazes and bunny trails as possible so that all we see are puffs of smoke, and no gun.
All designed to con people into the next phase....
The creation of Covid and coverup was intentional. Lockdowns were probably self-guilt. These animal vaccines (2-5 years FDA approval) were a pathway to human vaccines (20 years). Why the creators of Covid also created the jabs. Omicron probably from NA wt deer, which US virologists use to model contagious vaccines:
http://web.evolbio.mpg.de/HEVIMAs/