Please take notice of this - it does not matter if you replaced everyone in the legislature or congress with saints. The outcomes would turn out the same because THAT is not the problem. Everyone is seeing that as the problem but it's not. The problem is the system itself. The system of voting for people. It makes no sense at all. Just l…
Please take notice of this - it does not matter if you replaced everyone in the legislature or congress with saints. The outcomes would turn out the same because THAT is not the problem. Everyone is seeing that as the problem but it's not. The problem is the system itself. The system of voting for people. It makes no sense at all. Just like the economy makes no sense to be based on debt, greed and blackmail. The fundamentals have to make sense. They have to be properly aligned. So hoping to change over the bums that sit in political positions is going to do zip, zero, nada.
I hear you on the corruption. If the system of voting for people is wrong, then what? A monarchy? Someone was saying that monarchy is a better system to me the other day, and mentioned the same points you make. A monarchy with a parliament, PM, etc.
No, no, that's your assumption of what I said. This shows a common pitfall - to assume instead of ask questions. I wait for people to ask questions now because it's good therapy. But there is another way which for some reason nobody else seems to see except for myself.
Please take notice of this - it does not matter if you replaced everyone in the legislature or congress with saints. The outcomes would turn out the same because THAT is not the problem. Everyone is seeing that as the problem but it's not. The problem is the system itself. The system of voting for people. It makes no sense at all. Just like the economy makes no sense to be based on debt, greed and blackmail. The fundamentals have to make sense. They have to be properly aligned. So hoping to change over the bums that sit in political positions is going to do zip, zero, nada.
I hear you on the corruption. If the system of voting for people is wrong, then what? A monarchy? Someone was saying that monarchy is a better system to me the other day, and mentioned the same points you make. A monarchy with a parliament, PM, etc.
lets see, no people, then adopt AI? The same AI that is proven to be often incorrect and lies regularly about the truth?
No, no, that's your assumption of what I said. This shows a common pitfall - to assume instead of ask questions. I wait for people to ask questions now because it's good therapy. But there is another way which for some reason nobody else seems to see except for myself.