Wait, isn't not having experience what people argued was his best quality? Why would that reverse course now? Don't we want an outsider that fights the system?
BTW, are you talking about the experience of putting us under emergency powers, closing down small businesses, suspending personal property rights, signing huge bills that are win …
Wait, isn't not having experience what people argued was his best quality? Why would that reverse course now? Don't we want an outsider that fights the system?
BTW, are you talking about the experience of putting us under emergency powers, closing down small businesses, suspending personal property rights, signing huge bills that are win falls for pharmaceutical companies where they have no liability and get to make billions of dollars and kill millions of people with their poorly tested novel gene therapy? Or the experience of printing checks to send out to people while not working and causing massive inflation? Hiring former pharmaceutical executives to serve in HHS? Allowing Fauci to run circles around him and destroy the country? That kind of experience?
You are being black and white, and that's not good. One thing I will add is that Birx, Fauci, and Redfield conveyed to President Trump that the three had made a pact, that if one was fired, the other two would quit.
How am I being black and white by recognizing that Trump did everything needed to set us up for a bio-fascist state? He did some great things in his first two or three years, and then when it counted, he did everything Big Pharma needed him to do.
And why would that have been bad to have all three quit at one time? He could have replaced them with people who understood the data and didn't destroy the country and deny people early treatments. Think of how many lives would have been saved. There were many good, qualified people who could have filled their shoes. Probably many people who testified to congress about the importance and effectiveness of early treatments could have stepped up or perhaps some of the people who signed on to the Great Barrington Declaration? Atlas was a voice of reason. He would have been great. Paul Alexander. Anyone but those three.
Wait, isn't not having experience what people argued was his best quality? Why would that reverse course now? Don't we want an outsider that fights the system?
BTW, are you talking about the experience of putting us under emergency powers, closing down small businesses, suspending personal property rights, signing huge bills that are win falls for pharmaceutical companies where they have no liability and get to make billions of dollars and kill millions of people with their poorly tested novel gene therapy? Or the experience of printing checks to send out to people while not working and causing massive inflation? Hiring former pharmaceutical executives to serve in HHS? Allowing Fauci to run circles around him and destroy the country? That kind of experience?
Uhm, no thanks.
You are being black and white, and that's not good. One thing I will add is that Birx, Fauci, and Redfield conveyed to President Trump that the three had made a pact, that if one was fired, the other two would quit.
How am I being black and white by recognizing that Trump did everything needed to set us up for a bio-fascist state? He did some great things in his first two or three years, and then when it counted, he did everything Big Pharma needed him to do.
And why would that have been bad to have all three quit at one time? He could have replaced them with people who understood the data and didn't destroy the country and deny people early treatments. Think of how many lives would have been saved. There were many good, qualified people who could have filled their shoes. Probably many people who testified to congress about the importance and effectiveness of early treatments could have stepped up or perhaps some of the people who signed on to the Great Barrington Declaration? Atlas was a voice of reason. He would have been great. Paul Alexander. Anyone but those three.