63 Comments
User's avatar
BOB E's avatar

And the producers of this shitty mess, were granted full indemnity from accountability for the tragic unknown cost of lives so they could make billions, killing perhaps millions-Congress change the law, no one should ever be able to do this again and never forced injections.

Expand full comment
Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Yes, by Ronald Reagan in 1986. I campaigned for him in 1980, but there were many disappointments. Releasing mental health patients on the street, the theft of Inslaw's Promis software, the death of 241 Marines in Beirut who were on a "peace mission," and no retaliation against the perpetrators, implementing the Soviet form of education in our classrooms via Gorbachev's meetings with Reagan, and the amnesty given to illegals who brought in their families as well.

Expand full comment
Keven Mosley-Koehler's avatar

You are wrong. Reagan gave millions in tax dollars to organizations and entities to replace mental institutional care and support. They sucked at it amd as we have recently learned filed and do fill their own greedypockets with those dollars, so here we are.

Expand full comment
Elle's avatar

That happens when they give money to the States for a purpose. The state then uses it for otherwise for its own purpose, neglecting the original intent. JFK did this same thing too. Nothing replaced the facilities for the long term suffering of the seriously mentally ill population. Homelessness and begging was the result.

Expand full comment
Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Uh huh, well, that's nice, but no one watched where the money went, just like today. We're sending money to unborn children? Insanity still rules. I was a Reagan supporter, and all presidents make mistakes, they're human, but there were too man HUGE mistakes. Soviets in the classroom and 241 dead Marines, not to mention the allowed theft of Promis from Bill Hamilton's company.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Please detail the Soviet stuff in classrooms and the theft of Promis, Kelleigh. Lots I am not aware of!

and. . .

I too voted for him but can't assign the Marines' deaths to him, really, that is a problem directly attributable to Marine commanders, CIA, and Israel. . . more than likely. Why dump that on any president?

Expand full comment
Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

No, the deaths of those Marines had to do with who Reagan listened to, and then he never retaliated. I will always hold him responsible for those men's lives.

As for the Soviets in the classroom, Charlotte Iserbyt was the gal who researched and exposed that when she was in the education department for Reagan and found tons of info that no one knew about. She started copying everything and kept all the info in her hotel room. when she thought she had it all, she called her husband and said, get a UHaul and come get me and she took it home and wrote her 1999 book, THE DELIBERATE DUMBING DOWN OF AMERICA. She rewrote it later, but the original is what you want.

https://archive.org/stream/charlotte-thomson-iserbyt-soviets-in-the-classroom/Charlotte%20Thomson%20Iserbyt%20-%20Soviets%20in%20the%20Classroom_djvu.txt

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

Holy Crapp.

again. . . I did NOT know that. thanks.

. . . but I have ALWAYS suspected something like this.

Expand full comment
John Thompson's avatar

I feel so sorry for those who took mRNA gene therapies. Even now, I meet covidiots spreading hate against "anti va666ers". Ask these people "what's pubmed" and they have no clue. Never read a single paper. Don't have to because their emotion and sense of superiority is all that matters. These propaganda spreaders are the real enemy. I have a database of about a couple hundred mRNA papers like this on my reader. When I bump into one of these people, I destroy their arguments. I make it a point to quote enough solid science, they look like silly. I advise everyone to build a database, and then make it your mission to use that science on these types when they open their mouths.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

I applaud your efforts to change their minds, but it's probably hopeless. These types follow their "thought leaders" - MDs, MSM, celebrities, government pronouncements (until the change in administration, they'll think this admin lies). Their thought leaders know the truth and lie for their own reasons. Unless their incentives change, they'll keep lying, and their minions will believe every word.

Expand full comment
Jeck's avatar

As long as a person's (lazy) decision tree defaults to trusting the New York Times more than you, me, and every other naysayer, they simply will view this information as not credible.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

I will second that one, Steel-man.

Expand full comment
David O'Halloran's avatar

Those who took the shots are now spike factories living in fear of the consequences. If this is medicine, I must be Donald Duck. When will our legislators wake up and stop this? Makes me suspect they are even more brainwashed than common folk.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Many agree with your first sentence. I'm not so sure, denial seems the default position. Acknowledging they were stupid and gullible is the exception. I wonder if there are surveys to "answer" this. "Answer" in quotes because if I've learned anything, it's to never trust studies, surveys, or anything except my personal experience. My experience is "head in the sand" is where the jabbees are.

Expand full comment
Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

I've lost friends because they took these jabs and I can't tell their survivors that they were murdered, most don't know the truth. They're still watching regular channels.

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar
3dEdited

I'm confused by this sentence:

"Notably, the cytokine profile remains favorably altered in young adults who received mRNA vaccinations, even after 1 year."

Why is the word "favorably" used? That implies the vaccines altered the cytokine profile in a good way. In fact, doesn't imply, flat out states that it is "favorable"? Anyone else surprised by this wording, and confused? If they just mean cytokines went up, wouldn't they have simply replaced "favorably altered" by "elevated"?

Expand full comment
Debra Nolasco's avatar

I had the very same thought when I read the article.

Expand full comment
Msrian's avatar

I stopped and pondered that word. It didn't fit at all.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

I think that was their cock-a-mamey way of nodding to the Powers that Be that gateway the approval process, OR an outright cynical insinuation!

Expand full comment
Leslie's avatar

FDA just fast tracked Bill Gates replicon mRNA for Bird Flu. There is NO reason for this. "The fast track was awarded to Arcturus Therapeutics, a Bill Gates-funded company specializing in mRNA-based pharmaceuticals, for its ARCT-2304 mRNA “vaccine.”" Revolving door between FDA, Arcturus, and Gates Foundation - "Arcturus Therapeutics’ senior advisors, former CDC and FDA official Dr. Peter A. Patriarca, also advises the Gates Foundation."https://slaynews.com/news/fda-fast-tracks-bill-gates-replicon-mrna-vaccine-bird-flu/

Expand full comment
Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Yes, Slay puts out some great stuff, all true. Thanks for the link.

Expand full comment
Roy McIntosh's avatar

September 2020 I was at a protest meeting, Holyrood, Edinburgh and Delores Cahill warned people that they would be ill or die for years to come because of the JABS----Not sure how many years. But so far what she said has become fact!

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Trouble is, the jabs are just safe enough they can get away with continued obfuscation. I'll never forget Judy Mikovits said most of the jabbed would be dead by December 2021. How could I forget a claim like that? Geert Vanden Bosche predicted mass death for jabbees due to OAS and related issues - his timelines have come and gone several times. I'm not saying I wish harm to anybody, but until the damage is so bad everybody in power is harmed or has loved ones harmed, badly, the PTB will stick to the script. It looks like they've dodged that bullet. Cancer, heart disease, neurological problems years down the road are excused away, easily, when you control the messengers.

Expand full comment
Kelleigh Nelson's avatar

Realistically we have lost a lot of people already. However, in a country as big as ours, you don't notice several million or more missing unless it hits your own family. I have lost two very dear friends and neighbors who have become ill from the jabs and some have passed. Surely, I'm not the exception.

Expand full comment
Roy McIntosh's avatar

Shall the public ever get the true figures etc!? So many people that have been maimed by the JAB do not make the link!

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar

Even if there was institutional pressure to get the true figures, and of course it's the opposite, the answer is no. Some jab-caused damage is impossible to conclusively prove was caused by the jab. Some can be proven by autopsy, but those are seldom done using techniques that can detect jab damage. And it's too late now anyway for those in the ground or cremated.

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

well said, Steel man. I will second that.

These facts explain the insidious and thought-out plans of these elitists.

Their plans for humanity likely include the themes for "1984" rolled into de-population plans from the WEF.

Expand full comment
DeborahLynnPalmer's avatar

Let’s ALL sign up for one of those toxic injections!! Come on EVERYONE, let’s go. I want to be first in LINE, just in case they run out! I WANT MY SHARE! Come and on friends and FAMILY, let’s go… HURRY! Let’s get DEAD QUICKLY, LETS ALL SUFFER TOGETHER!! Come on Friends and FAMILY, let’s be BRAVE !! And dare that toxic INJECTION to harm us. Yeah, let’s go !!

Expand full comment
Sounds Like Nonsense's avatar

YES FOR OUR SAFETY AND HEALTH, because once your dead you can’t catch a virus.. LOL. QUICK SIGN UP FOR THE DEATH INJECTIONS ASAP and SAVE THE WORLD..

Expand full comment
Meredith's avatar

Has anyone done research on long term effects of J+J vax? Are effects similar to mRNA vaccines?

Expand full comment
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

The J&J shot is mRNA. They use a deactivated adenovirus with DNA in it that enters the nucleus of the cell where it is transcribed into mRNA. The mRNA exists the nucleus and is translated into the spike protein. The adverse effects are the same. Some people who got the J&J got lucky due to preexisting antibodies against the adenovirus shell, so the DNA never got delivered, and the spike never got made.

Expand full comment
Leanne Lundberg's avatar

So does that mean turbo cancers too for J&J shots?

Expand full comment
Dr. Kevin Stillwagon's avatar

I searched VAERS for cancers, vaccine specific. Percentage wise, more cancers were reported in the J&J group than Phizer and Moderna.

Expand full comment
Leanne Lundberg's avatar

Thanks for the info

Expand full comment
pretty-red, old guy's avatar

so, J & J basically got around Pfizer patents by using Deactiv. ADV as opposed to LNP's to get past our human immune, first line defenses.

These bastards. All of them.

Expand full comment
Alan's avatar

I've never read anything about long term effects, but I'm curious too.

Expand full comment
Jeck's avatar

Negative efficacy has been evident from the start. What do you suppose they are waiting for?

Expand full comment
Elizabeth D.'s avatar

Thank you Dr. for sharing the study. Any amount of information is good to have weather hopeful or disappointing. The fact studies are being conducted gives me reason to think progress can be made. But I must confess to hoping progress will lead to the elimination of gene manipulation altogether.

Expand full comment
DaughteroftheKing's avatar

THANK YOU for continuing to sound the alarm!

Expand full comment
John's avatar

Longitudinal studies carry very little weight because there's no controls there's no blinding so don't draw very many conclusions for this study.

Expand full comment
Elizabeth D.'s avatar

In evidence based medicine I’d say you could view this as simple clinical observation? In which case, the data becomes interesting. Would you discount it altogether? I find the study thought provoking. ;-)

Expand full comment
SteelJ's avatar
3dEdited

I suspect they figure since they measured baseline (before jab), and observed change over time, and there is ample literature to know what the expected change over time would be if there were no treatment applied, the change can be attributed to the jab. Just guessing, I'm not a mind reader. Still, I agree, a control group would have been nice.

Expand full comment
SH's avatar

That vaccine study for safety? It HAS been done. Dr. Thomas appeared to be referencing a study by a European hexavalent vaccine manufacturer, GlaxoSmithKline (GSK).

In 2011, GSK produced a confidential report on SIDS. However, an Italian court forced GSK to make the report publicly available.

In the report, sudden deaths that occurred within 20 days after hexavalent vaccination were tabulated.

The manufacturer concluded that all sudden deaths were reported within days of receiving a vaccine.

Following the study, GSK sealed the report on its findings. https://slaynews.com/.../top-pediatrician-vaccines-cause.../

Expand full comment
john patrick clohessy's avatar

Is Trump reading this?

He could make an executive order banning alll these injections, what is he waiting for?

Expand full comment
Peter Krone's avatar

I wonder if the spike proteins and / or elevation of inflammatory cytokines can cross over into the fetus and newborn.. That would mean that the influence of these toxins will last more then one generation and maybe alter the health of humanity for ever.

Expand full comment
Seamus Mahoney's avatar

Gosh, didn't the (better informed) 'Tinfoil Hats' warn about this ? - that we were being lied to .

Expand full comment