This article smells to me as crated by AI only, as thousends of articles are. This way you develope a CV to enhance your chances to get a grant.
Many ,if not all article you quote are AI-generated and AI -peier reviewd.
This is more info about this topic.
Human-generated hoax papers published in respectable academic journals were published since 2005 using MIT AI model, тАЬSCIgen-An Automatic CS Paper GeneratorтАЭ. Between 2005-2014 they published in academic journals 120 algorithmically-generated gibberish articles.
THIS SHOULD BE SHOCKING TO THOSE, WHO HAVE, WITHOUT QUESTION,тАЭ TRUSTED THE SCIENCEтАЭ, IN THIS PERIOD. You quoted very likely many of them.
In 2021 a study found 243 SCIgen- generated papers published in academic journals.
The AI model Chat GPT-Large Language models, according with Wall Street Journal report from June 2024, published 11,300 fraudulent articles by Wiley, a 217-year-old publisher, who was forced to retract all these articles and to close 19 of its journals. This is described as тАЬthe academic sausage -making factoryтАЭ. Deception, deception, deception!
The general method described is тАЬthe sandwich methodтАЭ:
First, a genuine scientific article title is borrowed, snatched, stollen, and its title changed to relate the paper to a popular research topic. Then, a technical section is selected from stock formulae and standard definitions are added.
Next, a тАЬresultтАЭ section is added, purporting to show how AI has been applied to a public dataset тАЬto shed new lightтАЭ on the issue under examination.
Finally, some IRRELEVANT CITATIONS (who really cares?) are added to give the paper the appearance of ACADEMIC CREDIBILITY. And, voila, the sandwich is served.
The fact that these 11,000 of these nonsense papers were actually published, indicates that THE ENTIRE тАЬPEER REVIEWтАЭ PROCESS IS A JOKE. We know no one is reading these journals. These journals exist only to give researchers another тАЬpeer-reviewed publicationтАЭ credit for their academic CV and for a grant application.
This will blow your mind: AI already тАЬassistтАЭ the peer review process. Why?
Because, every year 15 million hours are spent on reviewing of manuscripts previously rejected and resubmitted to other Journals. So, the deluge of mostly AI-generated articles to review, are тАЬpeer-reviewedтАЭ by another AI.
What could go wrong? This is not a fringe idea, the main journals like Nature and many others, are now using these days, the lying AI.
AI-driven, human-тАЬassistedтАЭ peer review has been NORMALIZED IN ACADEMIA.
So, these days, AI reviewers check paper written by AI, publish in journals nobody reads, except AI themselves, which train AI with this wicked informational feedback loop.
Where is the quality control? Nowhere!
Dr McCullough, if this did not convince you, that ALL, so called, тАЬscientific medical researchтАЭ is becoming A SCIENCE FRAUD, A COMPUTER SIMULATION, A VIRTUAL REALITY, A GENUINE FAKE SCIENCE, AN IMAGINATION OF EVIL MINDS, AN AI-GENERATED DECEPTION, I believe nothing will be able to convince you.
I wander how many articles you regularly quote, could have been AI-generated. One single article I took the time to check, was published by Wiley.
It is my hope that in your new position as Editor-in-chief at International Journal of Cardiovascular Research and Innovation, you will reject AI.
More likely bird flu is a PCR based scam that needs to be disclosed.
indeed Derek; the whole thing seems a gigantic windup; bird flu, pelican flu, hippo flu, rhino flu; penguin flu; how much longer can they keep going?
I believe this IS THE SIMPLE TRUTH.
This article smells to me as crated by AI only, as thousends of articles are. This way you develope a CV to enhance your chances to get a grant.
Many ,if not all article you quote are AI-generated and AI -peier reviewd.
This is more info about this topic.
Human-generated hoax papers published in respectable academic journals were published since 2005 using MIT AI model, тАЬSCIgen-An Automatic CS Paper GeneratorтАЭ. Between 2005-2014 they published in academic journals 120 algorithmically-generated gibberish articles.
THIS SHOULD BE SHOCKING TO THOSE, WHO HAVE, WITHOUT QUESTION,тАЭ TRUSTED THE SCIENCEтАЭ, IN THIS PERIOD. You quoted very likely many of them.
In 2021 a study found 243 SCIgen- generated papers published in academic journals.
The AI model Chat GPT-Large Language models, according with Wall Street Journal report from June 2024, published 11,300 fraudulent articles by Wiley, a 217-year-old publisher, who was forced to retract all these articles and to close 19 of its journals. This is described as тАЬthe academic sausage -making factoryтАЭ. Deception, deception, deception!
The general method described is тАЬthe sandwich methodтАЭ:
First, a genuine scientific article title is borrowed, snatched, stollen, and its title changed to relate the paper to a popular research topic. Then, a technical section is selected from stock formulae and standard definitions are added.
Next, a тАЬresultтАЭ section is added, purporting to show how AI has been applied to a public dataset тАЬto shed new lightтАЭ on the issue under examination.
Finally, some IRRELEVANT CITATIONS (who really cares?) are added to give the paper the appearance of ACADEMIC CREDIBILITY. And, voila, the sandwich is served.
The fact that these 11,000 of these nonsense papers were actually published, indicates that THE ENTIRE тАЬPEER REVIEWтАЭ PROCESS IS A JOKE. We know no one is reading these journals. These journals exist only to give researchers another тАЬpeer-reviewed publicationтАЭ credit for their academic CV and for a grant application.
This will blow your mind: AI already тАЬassistтАЭ the peer review process. Why?
Because, every year 15 million hours are spent on reviewing of manuscripts previously rejected and resubmitted to other Journals. So, the deluge of mostly AI-generated articles to review, are тАЬpeer-reviewedтАЭ by another AI.
What could go wrong? This is not a fringe idea, the main journals like Nature and many others, are now using these days, the lying AI.
AI-driven, human-тАЬassistedтАЭ peer review has been NORMALIZED IN ACADEMIA.
So, these days, AI reviewers check paper written by AI, publish in journals nobody reads, except AI themselves, which train AI with this wicked informational feedback loop.
Where is the quality control? Nowhere!
Dr McCullough, if this did not convince you, that ALL, so called, тАЬscientific medical researchтАЭ is becoming A SCIENCE FRAUD, A COMPUTER SIMULATION, A VIRTUAL REALITY, A GENUINE FAKE SCIENCE, AN IMAGINATION OF EVIL MINDS, AN AI-GENERATED DECEPTION, I believe nothing will be able to convince you.
I wander how many articles you regularly quote, could have been AI-generated. One single article I took the time to check, was published by Wiley.
It is my hope that in your new position as Editor-in-chief at International Journal of Cardiovascular Research and Innovation, you will reject AI.