"As a result, parents and doctors should have a complete free choice on the issue of vaccination with no pressure, coercion, or threat of reprisal for whatever decision is made."
That this has to be said reveals just how bad the entire vaccine cabal has become.
Future immunocompromise cannot be predicted. However, immune status against communicable diseases like measles can be established prior to considering a shot called a vaccine. Many children have been naturally exposed and developed immunity without presenting symptoms. In this case, if the child had IgA antibodies against measles and/or cytotoxic t-cell reactions to measles antigens, the measles vaccine would have been contraindicated. Yes, we can measure those. Fact check it.
Could the measles vaccine have caused the AML? No mention was made of that possibility. I understand the urgency in wanting to begin treatment of the AML, but would it not be contraindicated to administer an immunosuppressive chemotherapy so soon after vaccination with any live attenuated virus? If deemed necessary to do that, would it have been possible to plan for treatment of measles with gamma globulin or something, anticipating that measles would develop in this scenario?
In treating diseases where a vaccine is planned, knowing every possible lethal adverse effect of the vaccine that is intended to be used, each patient should first be treated with substances that reduce the possible lethal adverse effects, assuming that such substances exist and are even much safer.
Wondering if the mother ws jabbed by the COvid genomic therapy before pregnancy and even during pregnancy with boosters. This child needs to be tested for the COVID mRNA poison.
After all we've learned over the past 5 years -- the "virus" and the "vaccine" have opened the door to a huge realization that 74 vaccines between birth and 18 years of age is destroying an entire generation of children. Why would anyone -- especially a doctor -- give a "previously healthy infant" any vaccine until the child is at least 2 or more years of age. If this child was immunocompromised does that mean the child already had a few shots and the child's immune system was already endangered?
This is a very confusing case, especially for the layman . It all happened so fast. The child is vaccinated for MMR, diagnosed with leukemia and chemo is started all within a couple weeks? It sounds like they need a protocol as to how soon after vaccination they can start chemo. Would delay have been fatal?
I often wonder if it really makes sense to compare very low absolute risks, for example less than 0.1% (1/1,000), even if calculated on cohort populations much larger than the denominator and then among these low ARs, to affirm the relative risk reductions RRR are very significant.
In these calculations, the confounding variables or biases should be identified without discarding anything and it should be possible to establish individually their percentage influence at least 10 times lower than the lowest absolute risk that one wants to compare.
the mathematical methods, the exclusion or adjustment of the confounding variables should be applied to confirm that even their combination (or even statistical summation) does not significantly alter the absolute risk.
In practice, I believe that statistics are not yet applied correctly.
If I remember correctly, Matthias Desmet did his doctoral thesis demonstrating that incorrect statistical methods are very frequently used in published studies.
thanks , unfortunately, psychologists or psychoanalysts or psychotherapists who should distinguish better than their patients, social lies, myths and the mechanisms with which ideologies are formed, have joined the covid vaccination with percentages much higher than their patients,
maybe mattia desmet has not done so, but since he cares about being famous he should include this consequence (or cause...) among his study priorities and ask himself if psychology, psychoanalysis and psychotherapy have a fundamental problem that would seem to be completely removed, that is why, for these disciplines and their followers, submitting to dictatorship is something completely automatic?
Some time ago I followed a non-academic seminar on Lacan, who was perhaps something more than both Freud and Jung than Illmann etc., if nothing else he postulated a fundamental split in man perhaps eternal, which is not really a confrontation with himself since he undergoes it, I did not follow for long because I saw that even the leaders of the Lacanian school (and not only) have joined the campaign mentioned above.
So what can I say? certainly every type of analysis of the mind has proven to be highly corruptible, it is as if this type of "cure" generated and developed in the 20th century, in response to alienation is a huge "fake" that is not capable of preventing anything unless the damage is already done, these therapists are in fact always late to say the least.
furthermore, technocratic civilization is a removal by definition, man cannot see himself and technology serves to not see what one does, the reason for this probably lies in its power that we contribute to increasing every day, until we probably see that machines also develop an anguish, and it will take more time if there will be any... I apologize but I feel like saying this
Case reports like this are quite sad. They can be interesting, stimulating our curiosity, but there are so many variables that no conclusions can be made.
"As a result, parents and doctors should have a complete free choice on the issue of vaccination with no pressure, coercion, or threat of reprisal for whatever decision is made."
That this has to be said reveals just how bad the entire vaccine cabal has become.
Future immunocompromise cannot be predicted. However, immune status against communicable diseases like measles can be established prior to considering a shot called a vaccine. Many children have been naturally exposed and developed immunity without presenting symptoms. In this case, if the child had IgA antibodies against measles and/or cytotoxic t-cell reactions to measles antigens, the measles vaccine would have been contraindicated. Yes, we can measure those. Fact check it.
https://rumble.com/v6qbuok-rethinking-how-we-measure-immunity.html
Could the measles vaccine have caused the AML? No mention was made of that possibility. I understand the urgency in wanting to begin treatment of the AML, but would it not be contraindicated to administer an immunosuppressive chemotherapy so soon after vaccination with any live attenuated virus? If deemed necessary to do that, would it have been possible to plan for treatment of measles with gamma globulin or something, anticipating that measles would develop in this scenario?
In treating diseases where a vaccine is planned, knowing every possible lethal adverse effect of the vaccine that is intended to be used, each patient should first be treated with substances that reduce the possible lethal adverse effects, assuming that such substances exist and are even much safer.
Wondering if the mother ws jabbed by the COvid genomic therapy before pregnancy and even during pregnancy with boosters. This child needs to be tested for the COVID mRNA poison.
Tragic all of this and the lies behind it
After all we've learned over the past 5 years -- the "virus" and the "vaccine" have opened the door to a huge realization that 74 vaccines between birth and 18 years of age is destroying an entire generation of children. Why would anyone -- especially a doctor -- give a "previously healthy infant" any vaccine until the child is at least 2 or more years of age. If this child was immunocompromised does that mean the child already had a few shots and the child's immune system was already endangered?
This is a very confusing case, especially for the layman . It all happened so fast. The child is vaccinated for MMR, diagnosed with leukemia and chemo is started all within a couple weeks? It sounds like they need a protocol as to how soon after vaccination they can start chemo. Would delay have been fatal?
I often wonder if it really makes sense to compare very low absolute risks, for example less than 0.1% (1/1,000), even if calculated on cohort populations much larger than the denominator and then among these low ARs, to affirm the relative risk reductions RRR are very significant.
In these calculations, the confounding variables or biases should be identified without discarding anything and it should be possible to establish individually their percentage influence at least 10 times lower than the lowest absolute risk that one wants to compare.
the mathematical methods, the exclusion or adjustment of the confounding variables should be applied to confirm that even their combination (or even statistical summation) does not significantly alter the absolute risk.
In practice, I believe that statistics are not yet applied correctly.
If I remember correctly, Matthias Desmet did his doctoral thesis demonstrating that incorrect statistical methods are very frequently used in published studies.
thanks , unfortunately, psychologists or psychoanalysts or psychotherapists who should distinguish better than their patients, social lies, myths and the mechanisms with which ideologies are formed, have joined the covid vaccination with percentages much higher than their patients,
maybe mattia desmet has not done so, but since he cares about being famous he should include this consequence (or cause...) among his study priorities and ask himself if psychology, psychoanalysis and psychotherapy have a fundamental problem that would seem to be completely removed, that is why, for these disciplines and their followers, submitting to dictatorship is something completely automatic?
Some time ago I followed a non-academic seminar on Lacan, who was perhaps something more than both Freud and Jung than Illmann etc., if nothing else he postulated a fundamental split in man perhaps eternal, which is not really a confrontation with himself since he undergoes it, I did not follow for long because I saw that even the leaders of the Lacanian school (and not only) have joined the campaign mentioned above.
So what can I say? certainly every type of analysis of the mind has proven to be highly corruptible, it is as if this type of "cure" generated and developed in the 20th century, in response to alienation is a huge "fake" that is not capable of preventing anything unless the damage is already done, these therapists are in fact always late to say the least.
furthermore, technocratic civilization is a removal by definition, man cannot see himself and technology serves to not see what one does, the reason for this probably lies in its power that we contribute to increasing every day, until we probably see that machines also develop an anguish, and it will take more time if there will be any... I apologize but I feel like saying this
Case reports like this are quite sad. They can be interesting, stimulating our curiosity, but there are so many variables that no conclusions can be made.