Again, as a Brit, there is some grounds now for singling out the UK as the worst country in the Western world. Utterly marinated in all the worst ideas in the West: woke, globalist, deep state, russo-phobic, net zero, anti-free speech, high taxes, war mongering, open borders, big state, surveillance state, you name it! It is a horrible combination of being very expensive to live in without any justifying quality of life in return. A country that still has a very strange neo-colonial obsession with intervening in all sorts of foreign affairs and which still deludes itself that it is a great power. The US should be very, very careful about getting itself entangled by the UK in any foreign wars or adventures.
If you did not mention you are a Brit, I would think you have been talking about Canada. Now I know where this disease comes from. The Commonwealth is all rotten to the core. Let’s get rid off the corrupt King and start revolution to overthrow all these corrupt governments. I don’t think it will be an easy task, but once we clean up one country there should be a snowball effect to clean up the other countries. The same happened when the Berlin Wall collapsed. This is the proof that it can be done.
John, the UK government has turned against its own people and the US. That long history lesson you just gave us was interesting, but it is a different world now. One that is being controlled by a few very very rich evil people who believe they are above us peons so they deserve to control everything. The one thing standing in the way of total world submission to these psychos is the United States of America. Europe (with the exception of Russia) has already fallen. The people of Europe are mostly nice folks with similar views to us Americans. However, their governments clearly have no desire to maintain the previous liberties always assumed to be Western virtues. They literally are trying to bring the world to its knees, and they almost achieved it with the last US administration. It is obvious to anyone who is not totally blind that whoever is controlling the Democratic party are not the puppets they select to get elected, and that their goal is to destroy the existing system of the United States, as this is the only thing standing in the way. That is why they hate Trump so much. Everything they did from the immediate huge deficit spending, open borders, allowing criminals to go free time after time to wreak havoc in society, wars, spending our tax dollars to corrupt not only our own country but others across the globe....it is all part of the plan to bring the entire world to its knees so the master saviors can break the will of the people who they hope and believe will capitulate. Trump has set them back so far and that is why they have tried everything to get rid of him. Fortunately for us, good always has God's backing.
You nail it. Had Harris been elected instead of Trump the world would have entered the final phase of the implementation of Agenda 2030. Trump's election presents us with 4 or even 12 years of reprieve during which, hopefully, a degree of sanity may return to the West.
The Europeans seemed desperately keen to keep the Ukraine war going, but it seems a peace deal has been raised and apparently Keir Starmer has come out saying he played a key role. So I think that's another loss for NWO - I don't think that was in a contingency plan. They haven't had success with the bird flus/pandemics that Hotez promised the moment Trump was inaugurated. The tariffs are strongly against the free-trade globalist idea, so that looks good.
Trump still has to stay alive, but all good so far :)
The Brits have been absolute snobs to the people of Great Britain -- repressing the crap out of the Irish and Scots and keeping Wales nice and poor. They sure pissed off the folks in the colonies. They went around the world finding ways to exploit people. Ever hear of India? How about the way they fucked over the Chinese with drugs?
It's about time the British elites got their butts whacked.
I spent time in Britain in the mid '70's and loved travelling all over the country via rail, safely and cheaply. Went back in 2009 for a long visit in the fall and was horrified to see the entire train system gutted and a mess. Foreigners crowded the trains at rush hour-- young mothers from Eastern Europe jostling prams full of babies made it a crowded nightmare. I stayed with an old Anerican friend in the city of. Sheffield where a huge mosque had been erected in the center of town and the old community gardens created at rhe onset of the Industrial revolution so the now factory employed peasants could grow a few veggies was being vandalized by Muslims who set fire to the sheds built for the gardeners over 150 years ago.
What in the hell were they thinking?
When people learned I was American I was not always treated very well. The dollar was much weaker against the pound then and I had trouble using my credit card and had to go to the bank to get pounds for all my transactions. I was very glad to leave merry old England.
You are not wrong and most probably right. Well said. The Biden administration must go down as the worst in the history of the USA. Who are these forces with the power to put a senile man in the US presidency and try to normalized boys in girls bathrooms, and much worse? Obviously they want the USA disintegrating into civil war while they harness its war machine to back their own interests. Honestly, I think they are London/New York based and closely connected to a land that has little right to exist but does exist and continues, paradoxically, to grow in power and territory as I write. I worry that Trump The Good, for all his horse sense, is almost blind on this pivotal matter. Hopefully God will cause his eyes to open a bit wider and we can all enter the promised land of world peace and harmony with co existence of all civilizations and lands based on their unique historic and cultural values.
"That long history lesson you just gave us was interesting, but it is a different world now." I agree with the rest of your post, but Britain's role in reconquering the U.S. and manipulating the U.S. into the two World Wars is entirely pertinent to today's world. There's a reason an early name for the globalist scheme was the Anglo-American Empire. What's going on now was planned more than a century ago, and Brits like Rhodes, Russell, and Rothchild were there from the start.
The intelligence agencies are running the west for the benefit of the globalists and the CCP. One of their main funding activities is human trafficking and associated blackmail for power and control. Your assessment on the UK is correct. We need to leave NATO and the UN like yesterday. We also need to curtail BB’s control of our Middle East policy that he’s been doing for 30 years with horrific results. He needs war to stay in power and out of jail. The President’s recent comments on Iran are concerning. It’s a very dicey situation for which there may be no good answer. The citizenry in Iran and Israel are not supportive of continued war in their region.
Intelligence agencies, CIA, and the other Neocon Warmonger pals have been sucking the cash out of the USA for their perpetual wars for perpetual profits.
Bush Sr. in cahoots with the single most evil mother trucker ever in government, LBJ, had go get rid of JFK to ramp up the Vietnam war for war profiteering by installing LBJ in as POTUS.
I can’t tell if Trump is playing this perfectly because people with TDS who also watch a lot of news have morphed into self-righteous warmongers guaranteeing the bankrupting of the west. It’s really hard to tell if he’s an imperfect good guy or a perfect bad guy.
right now i agree but I dont care because at least all the fraud and graft and everything else hidden in plain site is now OUT IN PLAIN SITE for us to question EVERYTHING and especially the Slimy MSM. lONG LIVE TRUMP from a hanging on by a thumbnail Brit.
Breaking News: Ukraine 'agrees to a 30-day ceasefire' with Russia as Trump lifts pause on military aid and intelligence sharing. … It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
100% correct. Perhaps the single most important thing on Earth right now is that Trump steers totally clear of these attempts by the UK and France to entrap the US into the war in Ukraine and direct confrontation with Russia. Be clear: that way lies WW3 and nuclear armageddon. Trump needs to make it 100% clear to the UK and France that if they take crazy actions such as setting up a "no fly" zone in Ukraine or sending in troops, then the US will definitely NOT support them. Make no mistake - such actions would be designed to provide a tripwire to drag the US in. The UK and France are fully aware that their armies cannot in any way fight Russia. Their plan is to draw in the US. That is what their attempts to get US "security guarantees" are all about.
He's been pretty clear about it so far, and with Tulsi as head of DNI I can hardly imagine that stance would change. For how long are the populations in the UK and other European nations going to put up with the madness?
Being in the UK right now is like being locked in the hold of a ship with an insane crew steering straight for the rocks and no way to get up on the bridge or to the engine room! The population is thoroughly propagandised via the BBC and the mainstream media
How did Ukraine get 337 drones to use yesterday? Was that massive jet fuel and cyanide spill/explosion “13” miles off the coast of England in the North Sea really an accident? It’s heating up.
Ominous stuff. Who gains from this? How could this be leveraged? This has all the hallmarks of a intelligence driven, black op and consider the timing. Maybe it will be main stream spun as an attack by Russia on America designed by the perps to scupper any peace attempt fast. I mentioned three days back, on here, I was on the look out for just such a war cause black op - a mini nuke with RUSSIA written on it going off in Kiev should do nicely or perhaps an American plane getting shot down somewhere or other by, you guessed it, the dastardly evil lying Russians.
I agree. But let's consider what happens if the French the Brits and "others" actually try to keep the war going with euros paying for it this time. Could Trump stop them? I doubt it. So who is running the show? Who wants this war? If I were President Trump I'd impose peace on the Ukraine today, before the Europeans can move. Elections in Ukraine immediately and reconstruction on a massive scale to bring the people around and help them reconcile. After that a solution in the middle east and Syria. After that serious negotiations with China and after that the reunification of Korea and after that world wide peace based on multiplicity of civilizations working in co operation with each other. But something tells me that there are forces that do not want world peace and see their advantage in the WW3.
One key question is would the Europeans dare to enter Ukraine with air or land forces if Trump very clearly and firmly tells them that they are on their own if they do so? That they will not benefit from ANY US support if they do that and get themselves into a war with Russia. I am not at all clear that Trump is clearly telling the Europeans that. I agree that it is essential that Ukraine is quickly ended, before the UK and France can cause more trouble. But Russia itself may not want to end the war quickly because they may wish to advance further into Ukraine to secure all of the four regions they claim.
What if Trump explicitly tells the UK and France not to do it? Would they obey? Would they be crazy enough to try? Again, I doubt they would actually do that. They might. I think all the silly talk of boots on the ground is marketing to keep the western Ukrainians fighting. I suspect what the Europeans really want is to keep the Ukrainians fighting by paying for it - making the western Ukrainians effectively European mercenaries - so they can claim they are not at war with Russia when they really are and so get all the benefits in terms of money printing, propaganda control of home populations, intelligence meddling, etc., etc. Just like Korea in fact. Nobody calls that the Chinese American war. It is always called the Korean civil war. Same in Ukraine. I think Russia wants a settlement. Partition, no NATO, lands under Russian control remaining so. Russia wants its victory recognized. I do not think they want to try to control western Ukraine beyond getting it to agree to not being in NATO. I do not think they have any interest in recreating the old Soviet Union's Empire by force of arms at all. It is not in Russia's interest to have a war with Western Europe. they are too busy creating a new world order with China, India, South America and so on to want to waste time and resources fighting a proxy war with UK and France in Ukraine. Weak powers start wars hoping for advantage. Powerful ones make peace. knowing they will build advantage. Maybe it will come down to that and Russia will have to compromise. But if Trump ends NATO then what difference does it make? Perhaps that is the best way forward for the USA and Russia, to isolate UK and France and show the world what they are really up to. But whatever happens it has to happen fast. If the Europeans turn on the money printing machines and start supplying advanced weapons quickly this war could go on for years. Who could or would be in a position to stop them? Trump and Putin must make a durable peace quickly.
They’ve quietly sent forces “to train and supply” Ukraine for at least two years. They’ve even recruited from the retired military. I don’t think we have any idea how entrenched this is. If so, the forbearance shown by the bear is surprising.
'Today, we've made an offer that the Ukrainians have accepted, which is to enter into a ceasefire and into immediate negotiations to end this conflict in a way that's enduring and sustainable,' said Rubio.
The Trump administration now plans to present the temporary ceasefire offer to Moscow, which has raised a series of demands.
Those include the removal of President Volodymyr Zelensky, recognizing seized territory as now independent states, and a prohibition on Ukraine joining the NATO alliance.
OK. A ceasefire that Ukraine has agreed to. Let's await developments. What d you suppose "we have made an offer" means? Is that code for security guarantees?
I hope that Trump clarifies the American position with Starmer - it's about time Uncle Sam left us to it and Starmer needs to be convinced that his sabre rattling will involve merely him and his sabre. Sadly, millions of British people are also hypnotised by the anti-Russian propaganda and have been since before the Crimean War. My late father was convinced the Soviets were easily as bad as Hitler and would destroy us all, given half a chance (not that he was too keen on the Yanks - "over-paid, over-sexed, over-here" in the 1940s, apparently!).
I also hope that you sane Americans realise that Starmer doesn't represent any of us (swept to power on 19% of the people who bothered to vote and they were mostly Marxists and Muslims which is a combination just waiting to start fighting each other). People who believe Covid was a reincarnation of The Black Death and CO2 is killing the planet are having no trouble believing Zelensky is the reincarnation of Churchill and Putin is the reincarnation of Hitler. Until their sons are sent to die (or invalided out due to undiagnosed vaccine-induce myocarditis) whilst they freeze in their unheatable homes sucking on a raw grasshopper burger watching the elite fly off on holidays they can't afford and aren't allowed to have anyway and planning how to make their daughters wear burkas. Maybe when all that happens they will wake up and realise who their enemies actually are!
Can we even refer to the Western European nations as sovereign in any way anymore? The EU seems to now be the head of the snake of the globalist enterprise and they appear to be so desperate now that they're out to challenge China as the most tyrannical force on the planet. The EU is finished, but I suspect it's going to take a long time for its full dissolution and they're going to cause a lot of damage along the way. Hopefully, the present uprisings in Romania and other Eastern European countries will have a strong ripple effect and more fully expose these tyrants in order to bring them down more quickly. They hardly seem to have any other course of action in mind.
It occurred to me reading this that film and media darlings no longer have to support Russia because they have neo-Soviet regimes in western countries now.
I'm not sure why nobody seems to have grasped the true functionality of our "Prime Ministers" nor who midwifed the rebirth of something European into the World Economic Forum.
Context: The Royal, Banking, and Noble families of Western Europe, and their Associates in North America, realised about the middle of the nineteenth century that the magic capitalist money machine was eventually going to, er, slow down, with terrible consequences to their life style.
Be that as it may, the parlous state of political intellectuality of "The West" may be a marker for starting this note in other senses.
Starting from the arrival of Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister, the slow destruction of the machinery of industrial production has continued almost without pause, slow ("boiling frogs") as it may have been: though I can remember the almost-nightly news items of the closure of a sizeable factory or the shuttering of a commercial concern. I will not detail (for space) the other items that have assaulted the British Will To Work, but you can list them for yourself.
And more recently, the chain of ineffectual prime ministers, from May onwards, must see unreal to foreign observers. They do seem to have worsened. And how can this be, that we now find ourselves threatened, quite seriously, by senior Russian politicians while the their counterparts in the Other Big Country are also concentrating in the other direction?
My point is: WHO has been running the United Kingdom since 1970?
The eminent historian Carroll Quigley, in his substantial work "Tragedy and Hope" (Macmillan, 1966) dissects the term "Constitutional Monarchy" in the leading pages of Chapter X wherein the claim to be Constitutional is found to be light of weight.
My assent is based on the history of the most hapless placeholders, 5 in the last 8 years, who have failed in almost every promise on which we thought we were electing them.
Now we have Starmer asking for war against Russia and the latter responding with a direct and existential promise.
But was it the British People, or Sir Keir Starmer, to whom Russia's deadly threat was in reality addressed?
Let us all pray for true guidance in seeking the answer to that question.
Really appreciate your comment. I will look for the Quigley work. The last similar thing I read was Trevelyan’s short summary of the Glorious Revolution establishing finally that the law was above the King. It had to be so for the machine to function. And they plucked and installed the king!
I have the Thomas Babington Macaulay work, the History of England, the volume covering the Stuarts up to the accession of William and Mary.
Carroll Quigley's work is longer. It may be worth searching for a library or an electronic copy. My hardback version took a couple of tumbles and is not the book it once was :((
As a Brit, I heartily concur with this article. It is vital that Trump realises how bad things are in the UK right now and how awful, devious and dangerous Starmer is. He is trying very, very hard to escalate this war to a direct US-Russia clash.
'The West' HATES Russia; they hate REAL CHRISTIANS (just ONE of the reasons).
NAZI Starmer could just be playing his role. And when the UK/EU goes and starts shit with Russia, TRAITOR Trump will then say his lines, in this theatrical play....."Well, we ARE obligated to defend our allies, the UK/EU!". And then an even bigger war.....WW III, kicks off!
WHY else is CHINA 'getting ready'?? Because this THEATRICAL PLAY, by 'The West', is OBVIOUS to them, too??
The ultimate ring leaders do understand it. It’s a movement of power and spheres of influence; a removal of control which had been temporarily been parcelled out to individuals and their offspring who had escaped serfdom for 200-400 years.
Some basic truths: (1) The Ukrainians are outfighting the Russians. 100 Ukrainians are a match for 150 - 200 Russians. Unfortunately, for every 100 Ukrainians, there are 300 Russians. So, Ukraine is losing slowly. If we quit supporting them, they will lose fast. (2) The US is not going to enter the war on the side of Ukraine. The stakes are too high. We are not going to sacrifice DC for Kyiv. All of the rhetoric aside, without the US, none of the Europeans can or will act. (4) Putin isn’t going to quit, although he may be induced to a ceasefire. (5) Putin is not trustworthy. We may be able to make breaking the ceasefire unappetizing to Putin. We need to do this. (6) We can’t rely on strength in the Oval Office. It’s rare. So, whatever tripwire/boundary/redline we set up to contain Putin must be something even the most feckless Oval Office Occupant can’t ignore or welsh on. (7) Ukraine is a corrupt place. 20% to 50% of the aid that we’ve provided has been lost to corruption. Some US politicians are in on this. They should be punished. And the corruption must stop. We can’t afford it. (8) We also can’t afford to keep doing this. We don’t have the resources, and we have other “irons in the fire” that will require those resources. (9) We clearly have some forever war advocates in the US. They should be removed from government. Our safety and prosperity depend on it. (10) Trump’s plans and objectives deal with (1) through (9) above. No one else’s do.
Point 6 is the worst possible idea. The Ukrainians want this "tripwire" force. Why? Simple, so they can engineer clashes between the tripwire force and Russia. Their hope is to then draw in the whole of NATO and the US on their side. That way lies our collective deaths in nuclear war. The US already has a treaty to defend the borders of NATO. There is ZERO reason to extend that already over-extended guarantee beyond the borders of NATO, especially to a bunch of vile, corrupt lunatics such as those running Ukraine.
Point 6 is a pre-condition for lasting peace. Your answer implies a view point that if we just give Putin Ukraine it will all stop. Every action Putin has taken to date gives the lie to that perspective, e.g., Georgia, Chechnya. Chechnya (1994-1996) led to Chechnya (1999-2000), which led to Georgia (2008), which led to Ukraine (2014) which led directly to Ukraine (2022- present). As for Ukrainian (& Deep State) malfeasance — it must be controlled too.
Point 1 comes from the casualty rates taking things like force posture (defense, offense), combat environment (weather, terrain) and force strength (number of troops) into consideration.
Have for a good century. The British government persuaded the United States government to take its side in World War I and II. The British are not the good guys in Europe. Don't watch HDTV "news". Listen if you must to monitor the "Narrative", but don't watch.
The EU needs war. They need cash, and war is the best way to raise cash. The EU economy is headed for a depression, and Germany's GDP is falling. Germany is the economic engine of the EU.
You mentioned this: it was only the in 20th century that the British ruling class started making really bad decisions,
A note of interest: The players who started WW One were Queen Victoria's grandchildren. Incest was rampant in Europe, especially in the UK. This helps explain the insane decisions that started the war.
How America got involved is another interesting subject; that story shows America was pulled into war illegally and by deception.
The Crown has arguably enslaved, starved, slaughtered and directly controlled and ruined the most people in history. Forcing Indians into slavery to grow Opium to force on the Chinese at gunpoint (cannons) to create millions of addicts and then when the Chinese Boxers rebelled the Chinese Boxers are made to look like the bad guys.
I don't believe the UK leadership the past 100 plus years has been incompetent as it is a strategy. What they did in Palestine and then Israel was controlled by the Rothschilds which got us to the disaster point we are in the Middle East today. It is by design.
“Is UK trying to drag the US into a world war?” Our expansion of NATO over the last 30 years, despite promises to the contrary seems an awful lot like our former presidents were trying to get into a world war. That is not easily undone.
Expecting the rest of the world to turn on a dime with a new administration that acts unpredictably, and says things to intentionally offend and stir up controversy, seems unrealistic.
Again, as a Brit, there is some grounds now for singling out the UK as the worst country in the Western world. Utterly marinated in all the worst ideas in the West: woke, globalist, deep state, russo-phobic, net zero, anti-free speech, high taxes, war mongering, open borders, big state, surveillance state, you name it! It is a horrible combination of being very expensive to live in without any justifying quality of life in return. A country that still has a very strange neo-colonial obsession with intervening in all sorts of foreign affairs and which still deludes itself that it is a great power. The US should be very, very careful about getting itself entangled by the UK in any foreign wars or adventures.
I've told my girls (travelling age) not to UK until everything's fixed up. Looking pretty bad, especially for young women.
But Germany's not a shining light right now - it could be the worst.
If you did not mention you are a Brit, I would think you have been talking about Canada. Now I know where this disease comes from. The Commonwealth is all rotten to the core. Let’s get rid off the corrupt King and start revolution to overthrow all these corrupt governments. I don’t think it will be an easy task, but once we clean up one country there should be a snowball effect to clean up the other countries. The same happened when the Berlin Wall collapsed. This is the proof that it can be done.
John, the UK government has turned against its own people and the US. That long history lesson you just gave us was interesting, but it is a different world now. One that is being controlled by a few very very rich evil people who believe they are above us peons so they deserve to control everything. The one thing standing in the way of total world submission to these psychos is the United States of America. Europe (with the exception of Russia) has already fallen. The people of Europe are mostly nice folks with similar views to us Americans. However, their governments clearly have no desire to maintain the previous liberties always assumed to be Western virtues. They literally are trying to bring the world to its knees, and they almost achieved it with the last US administration. It is obvious to anyone who is not totally blind that whoever is controlling the Democratic party are not the puppets they select to get elected, and that their goal is to destroy the existing system of the United States, as this is the only thing standing in the way. That is why they hate Trump so much. Everything they did from the immediate huge deficit spending, open borders, allowing criminals to go free time after time to wreak havoc in society, wars, spending our tax dollars to corrupt not only our own country but others across the globe....it is all part of the plan to bring the entire world to its knees so the master saviors can break the will of the people who they hope and believe will capitulate. Trump has set them back so far and that is why they have tried everything to get rid of him. Fortunately for us, good always has God's backing.
You nail it. Had Harris been elected instead of Trump the world would have entered the final phase of the implementation of Agenda 2030. Trump's election presents us with 4 or even 12 years of reprieve during which, hopefully, a degree of sanity may return to the West.
I don’t know how we know that we are not still in a contingency version of A2030.
The Europeans seemed desperately keen to keep the Ukraine war going, but it seems a peace deal has been raised and apparently Keir Starmer has come out saying he played a key role. So I think that's another loss for NWO - I don't think that was in a contingency plan. They haven't had success with the bird flus/pandemics that Hotez promised the moment Trump was inaugurated. The tariffs are strongly against the free-trade globalist idea, so that looks good.
Trump still has to stay alive, but all good so far :)
of Agenda 2030stilon track. esg goals
The Brits have been absolute snobs to the people of Great Britain -- repressing the crap out of the Irish and Scots and keeping Wales nice and poor. They sure pissed off the folks in the colonies. They went around the world finding ways to exploit people. Ever hear of India? How about the way they fucked over the Chinese with drugs?
It's about time the British elites got their butts whacked.
I spent time in Britain in the mid '70's and loved travelling all over the country via rail, safely and cheaply. Went back in 2009 for a long visit in the fall and was horrified to see the entire train system gutted and a mess. Foreigners crowded the trains at rush hour-- young mothers from Eastern Europe jostling prams full of babies made it a crowded nightmare. I stayed with an old Anerican friend in the city of. Sheffield where a huge mosque had been erected in the center of town and the old community gardens created at rhe onset of the Industrial revolution so the now factory employed peasants could grow a few veggies was being vandalized by Muslims who set fire to the sheds built for the gardeners over 150 years ago.
What in the hell were they thinking?
When people learned I was American I was not always treated very well. The dollar was much weaker against the pound then and I had trouble using my credit card and had to go to the bank to get pounds for all my transactions. I was very glad to leave merry old England.
You are not wrong and most probably right. Well said. The Biden administration must go down as the worst in the history of the USA. Who are these forces with the power to put a senile man in the US presidency and try to normalized boys in girls bathrooms, and much worse? Obviously they want the USA disintegrating into civil war while they harness its war machine to back their own interests. Honestly, I think they are London/New York based and closely connected to a land that has little right to exist but does exist and continues, paradoxically, to grow in power and territory as I write. I worry that Trump The Good, for all his horse sense, is almost blind on this pivotal matter. Hopefully God will cause his eyes to open a bit wider and we can all enter the promised land of world peace and harmony with co existence of all civilizations and lands based on their unique historic and cultural values.
"That long history lesson you just gave us was interesting, but it is a different world now." I agree with the rest of your post, but Britain's role in reconquering the U.S. and manipulating the U.S. into the two World Wars is entirely pertinent to today's world. There's a reason an early name for the globalist scheme was the Anglo-American Empire. What's going on now was planned more than a century ago, and Brits like Rhodes, Russell, and Rothchild were there from the start.
Exactly so.
Great summary of the actual situation.
The intelligence agencies are running the west for the benefit of the globalists and the CCP. One of their main funding activities is human trafficking and associated blackmail for power and control. Your assessment on the UK is correct. We need to leave NATO and the UN like yesterday. We also need to curtail BB’s control of our Middle East policy that he’s been doing for 30 years with horrific results. He needs war to stay in power and out of jail. The President’s recent comments on Iran are concerning. It’s a very dicey situation for which there may be no good answer. The citizenry in Iran and Israel are not supportive of continued war in their region.
Intelligence agencies, CIA, and the other Neocon Warmonger pals have been sucking the cash out of the USA for their perpetual wars for perpetual profits.
Eisenhowers warning was / is ignored.
They shot Kennedy, then they shot his brother.
Bush Sr. in cahoots with the single most evil mother trucker ever in government, LBJ, had go get rid of JFK to ramp up the Vietnam war for war profiteering by installing LBJ in as POTUS.
I can’t tell if Trump is playing this perfectly because people with TDS who also watch a lot of news have morphed into self-righteous warmongers guaranteeing the bankrupting of the west. It’s really hard to tell if he’s an imperfect good guy or a perfect bad guy.
right now i agree but I dont care because at least all the fraud and graft and everything else hidden in plain site is now OUT IN PLAIN SITE for us to question EVERYTHING and especially the Slimy MSM. lONG LIVE TRUMP from a hanging on by a thumbnail Brit.
Breaking News: Ukraine 'agrees to a 30-day ceasefire' with Russia as Trump lifts pause on military aid and intelligence sharing. … It’s going to be a bumpy ride.
I hope the Russians know the old saying ‘Fool me once, shame on you; fool me twice….”
100% correct. Perhaps the single most important thing on Earth right now is that Trump steers totally clear of these attempts by the UK and France to entrap the US into the war in Ukraine and direct confrontation with Russia. Be clear: that way lies WW3 and nuclear armageddon. Trump needs to make it 100% clear to the UK and France that if they take crazy actions such as setting up a "no fly" zone in Ukraine or sending in troops, then the US will definitely NOT support them. Make no mistake - such actions would be designed to provide a tripwire to drag the US in. The UK and France are fully aware that their armies cannot in any way fight Russia. Their plan is to draw in the US. That is what their attempts to get US "security guarantees" are all about.
He's been pretty clear about it so far, and with Tulsi as head of DNI I can hardly imagine that stance would change. For how long are the populations in the UK and other European nations going to put up with the madness?
Being in the UK right now is like being locked in the hold of a ship with an insane crew steering straight for the rocks and no way to get up on the bridge or to the engine room! The population is thoroughly propagandised via the BBC and the mainstream media
Sorry to hear that. Kamala Starmer? We left decades ago and no regrets. Our advice would be to jump ship quick.
How did Ukraine get 337 drones to use yesterday? Was that massive jet fuel and cyanide spill/explosion “13” miles off the coast of England in the North Sea really an accident? It’s heating up.
Link please.
Link requested: https://news.sky.com/story/everything-you-need-to-know-about-north-sea-cargo-ship-and-tanker-collision-as-man-arrested-and-missing-sailor-presumed-dead-13325883
Ominous stuff. Who gains from this? How could this be leveraged? This has all the hallmarks of a intelligence driven, black op and consider the timing. Maybe it will be main stream spun as an attack by Russia on America designed by the perps to scupper any peace attempt fast. I mentioned three days back, on here, I was on the look out for just such a war cause black op - a mini nuke with RUSSIA written on it going off in Kiev should do nicely or perhaps an American plane getting shot down somewhere or other by, you guessed it, the dastardly evil lying Russians.
Thanks. Checking now.
I agree. But let's consider what happens if the French the Brits and "others" actually try to keep the war going with euros paying for it this time. Could Trump stop them? I doubt it. So who is running the show? Who wants this war? If I were President Trump I'd impose peace on the Ukraine today, before the Europeans can move. Elections in Ukraine immediately and reconstruction on a massive scale to bring the people around and help them reconcile. After that a solution in the middle east and Syria. After that serious negotiations with China and after that the reunification of Korea and after that world wide peace based on multiplicity of civilizations working in co operation with each other. But something tells me that there are forces that do not want world peace and see their advantage in the WW3.
One key question is would the Europeans dare to enter Ukraine with air or land forces if Trump very clearly and firmly tells them that they are on their own if they do so? That they will not benefit from ANY US support if they do that and get themselves into a war with Russia. I am not at all clear that Trump is clearly telling the Europeans that. I agree that it is essential that Ukraine is quickly ended, before the UK and France can cause more trouble. But Russia itself may not want to end the war quickly because they may wish to advance further into Ukraine to secure all of the four regions they claim.
What if Trump explicitly tells the UK and France not to do it? Would they obey? Would they be crazy enough to try? Again, I doubt they would actually do that. They might. I think all the silly talk of boots on the ground is marketing to keep the western Ukrainians fighting. I suspect what the Europeans really want is to keep the Ukrainians fighting by paying for it - making the western Ukrainians effectively European mercenaries - so they can claim they are not at war with Russia when they really are and so get all the benefits in terms of money printing, propaganda control of home populations, intelligence meddling, etc., etc. Just like Korea in fact. Nobody calls that the Chinese American war. It is always called the Korean civil war. Same in Ukraine. I think Russia wants a settlement. Partition, no NATO, lands under Russian control remaining so. Russia wants its victory recognized. I do not think they want to try to control western Ukraine beyond getting it to agree to not being in NATO. I do not think they have any interest in recreating the old Soviet Union's Empire by force of arms at all. It is not in Russia's interest to have a war with Western Europe. they are too busy creating a new world order with China, India, South America and so on to want to waste time and resources fighting a proxy war with UK and France in Ukraine. Weak powers start wars hoping for advantage. Powerful ones make peace. knowing they will build advantage. Maybe it will come down to that and Russia will have to compromise. But if Trump ends NATO then what difference does it make? Perhaps that is the best way forward for the USA and Russia, to isolate UK and France and show the world what they are really up to. But whatever happens it has to happen fast. If the Europeans turn on the money printing machines and start supplying advanced weapons quickly this war could go on for years. Who could or would be in a position to stop them? Trump and Putin must make a durable peace quickly.
They’ve quietly sent forces “to train and supply” Ukraine for at least two years. They’ve even recruited from the retired military. I don’t think we have any idea how entrenched this is. If so, the forbearance shown by the bear is surprising.
Or because they know whats happened when they backed off before
Breaking news is US support is back.
'Today, we've made an offer that the Ukrainians have accepted, which is to enter into a ceasefire and into immediate negotiations to end this conflict in a way that's enduring and sustainable,' said Rubio.
The Trump administration now plans to present the temporary ceasefire offer to Moscow, which has raised a series of demands.
Those include the removal of President Volodymyr Zelensky, recognizing seized territory as now independent states, and a prohibition on Ukraine joining the NATO alliance.
OK. A ceasefire that Ukraine has agreed to. Let's await developments. What d you suppose "we have made an offer" means? Is that code for security guarantees?
No
Support? No
Thanks for alert
I hope that Trump clarifies the American position with Starmer - it's about time Uncle Sam left us to it and Starmer needs to be convinced that his sabre rattling will involve merely him and his sabre. Sadly, millions of British people are also hypnotised by the anti-Russian propaganda and have been since before the Crimean War. My late father was convinced the Soviets were easily as bad as Hitler and would destroy us all, given half a chance (not that he was too keen on the Yanks - "over-paid, over-sexed, over-here" in the 1940s, apparently!).
I also hope that you sane Americans realise that Starmer doesn't represent any of us (swept to power on 19% of the people who bothered to vote and they were mostly Marxists and Muslims which is a combination just waiting to start fighting each other). People who believe Covid was a reincarnation of The Black Death and CO2 is killing the planet are having no trouble believing Zelensky is the reincarnation of Churchill and Putin is the reincarnation of Hitler. Until their sons are sent to die (or invalided out due to undiagnosed vaccine-induce myocarditis) whilst they freeze in their unheatable homes sucking on a raw grasshopper burger watching the elite fly off on holidays they can't afford and aren't allowed to have anyway and planning how to make their daughters wear burkas. Maybe when all that happens they will wake up and realise who their enemies actually are!
Sadly, I am hearing and reading a lot of pro-.Ukraine/anti-American flip flops by people formerly against Starmer and the uniparty antics.
Well put!
I hope English people not also be hypnotised by the anti-Russian propaganda, as the B'rit Yisrael are.
It wouldn't be the first time they've "dragged" the US into world war, it wouldn't be the second time either!
“Make the world safe for democracy” was Woodrow Wilson’s line in 1917 dragging Americans into the phosgene/chlorine/mustard gas and maxim gunfire.
WWI was over by 1917?
Can we even refer to the Western European nations as sovereign in any way anymore? The EU seems to now be the head of the snake of the globalist enterprise and they appear to be so desperate now that they're out to challenge China as the most tyrannical force on the planet. The EU is finished, but I suspect it's going to take a long time for its full dissolution and they're going to cause a lot of damage along the way. Hopefully, the present uprisings in Romania and other Eastern European countries will have a strong ripple effect and more fully expose these tyrants in order to bring them down more quickly. They hardly seem to have any other course of action in mind.
It occurred to me reading this that film and media darlings no longer have to support Russia because they have neo-Soviet regimes in western countries now.
I'm not sure why nobody seems to have grasped the true functionality of our "Prime Ministers" nor who midwifed the rebirth of something European into the World Economic Forum.
Context: The Royal, Banking, and Noble families of Western Europe, and their Associates in North America, realised about the middle of the nineteenth century that the magic capitalist money machine was eventually going to, er, slow down, with terrible consequences to their life style.
Be that as it may, the parlous state of political intellectuality of "The West" may be a marker for starting this note in other senses.
Starting from the arrival of Margaret Thatcher as Prime Minister, the slow destruction of the machinery of industrial production has continued almost without pause, slow ("boiling frogs") as it may have been: though I can remember the almost-nightly news items of the closure of a sizeable factory or the shuttering of a commercial concern. I will not detail (for space) the other items that have assaulted the British Will To Work, but you can list them for yourself.
And more recently, the chain of ineffectual prime ministers, from May onwards, must see unreal to foreign observers. They do seem to have worsened. And how can this be, that we now find ourselves threatened, quite seriously, by senior Russian politicians while the their counterparts in the Other Big Country are also concentrating in the other direction?
My point is: WHO has been running the United Kingdom since 1970?
The eminent historian Carroll Quigley, in his substantial work "Tragedy and Hope" (Macmillan, 1966) dissects the term "Constitutional Monarchy" in the leading pages of Chapter X wherein the claim to be Constitutional is found to be light of weight.
My assent is based on the history of the most hapless placeholders, 5 in the last 8 years, who have failed in almost every promise on which we thought we were electing them.
Now we have Starmer asking for war against Russia and the latter responding with a direct and existential promise.
But was it the British People, or Sir Keir Starmer, to whom Russia's deadly threat was in reality addressed?
Let us all pray for true guidance in seeking the answer to that question.
Thanks for the space. I treasure your work.
Really appreciate your comment. I will look for the Quigley work. The last similar thing I read was Trevelyan’s short summary of the Glorious Revolution establishing finally that the law was above the King. It had to be so for the machine to function. And they plucked and installed the king!
Thanks for the good word.
I have the Thomas Babington Macaulay work, the History of England, the volume covering the Stuarts up to the accession of William and Mary.
Carroll Quigley's work is longer. It may be worth searching for a library or an electronic copy. My hardback version took a couple of tumbles and is not the book it once was :((
As a Brit, I heartily concur with this article. It is vital that Trump realises how bad things are in the UK right now and how awful, devious and dangerous Starmer is. He is trying very, very hard to escalate this war to a direct US-Russia clash.
Unless this is all just THEATRE (via 'The West').
'The West' HATES Russia; they hate REAL CHRISTIANS (just ONE of the reasons).
NAZI Starmer could just be playing his role. And when the UK/EU goes and starts shit with Russia, TRAITOR Trump will then say his lines, in this theatrical play....."Well, we ARE obligated to defend our allies, the UK/EU!". And then an even bigger war.....WW III, kicks off!
WHY else is CHINA 'getting ready'?? Because this THEATRICAL PLAY, by 'The West', is OBVIOUS to them, too??
China are perhaps getting ready to defend Russia?
EXACTLY!!!
If the West starts shit with Russia......China (AND Iran)......WILL defend Russia.
The West are SUCH PSYCHOPATHS......they do not comprehend that they WILL get their asses handed to them.
The West keeps playing their Psycho Games.
The ultimate ring leaders do understand it. It’s a movement of power and spheres of influence; a removal of control which had been temporarily been parcelled out to individuals and their offspring who had escaped serfdom for 200-400 years.
Some basic truths: (1) The Ukrainians are outfighting the Russians. 100 Ukrainians are a match for 150 - 200 Russians. Unfortunately, for every 100 Ukrainians, there are 300 Russians. So, Ukraine is losing slowly. If we quit supporting them, they will lose fast. (2) The US is not going to enter the war on the side of Ukraine. The stakes are too high. We are not going to sacrifice DC for Kyiv. All of the rhetoric aside, without the US, none of the Europeans can or will act. (4) Putin isn’t going to quit, although he may be induced to a ceasefire. (5) Putin is not trustworthy. We may be able to make breaking the ceasefire unappetizing to Putin. We need to do this. (6) We can’t rely on strength in the Oval Office. It’s rare. So, whatever tripwire/boundary/redline we set up to contain Putin must be something even the most feckless Oval Office Occupant can’t ignore or welsh on. (7) Ukraine is a corrupt place. 20% to 50% of the aid that we’ve provided has been lost to corruption. Some US politicians are in on this. They should be punished. And the corruption must stop. We can’t afford it. (8) We also can’t afford to keep doing this. We don’t have the resources, and we have other “irons in the fire” that will require those resources. (9) We clearly have some forever war advocates in the US. They should be removed from government. Our safety and prosperity depend on it. (10) Trump’s plans and objectives deal with (1) through (9) above. No one else’s do.
Point 6 is the worst possible idea. The Ukrainians want this "tripwire" force. Why? Simple, so they can engineer clashes between the tripwire force and Russia. Their hope is to then draw in the whole of NATO and the US on their side. That way lies our collective deaths in nuclear war. The US already has a treaty to defend the borders of NATO. There is ZERO reason to extend that already over-extended guarantee beyond the borders of NATO, especially to a bunch of vile, corrupt lunatics such as those running Ukraine.
Point 6 is a pre-condition for lasting peace. Your answer implies a view point that if we just give Putin Ukraine it will all stop. Every action Putin has taken to date gives the lie to that perspective, e.g., Georgia, Chechnya. Chechnya (1994-1996) led to Chechnya (1999-2000), which led to Georgia (2008), which led to Ukraine (2014) which led directly to Ukraine (2022- present). As for Ukrainian (& Deep State) malfeasance — it must be controlled too.
Point 1 really depends where the intel comes from. Newer gear does not guarantee a superior force.
Point 1 comes from the casualty rates taking things like force posture (defense, offense), combat environment (weather, terrain) and force strength (number of troops) into consideration.
Take your Greater IshaRaEl hasbara back to the City of London!
Have for a good century. The British government persuaded the United States government to take its side in World War I and II. The British are not the good guys in Europe. Don't watch HDTV "news". Listen if you must to monitor the "Narrative", but don't watch.
Starmer is such a disaster domestically, he thought…hell, why not go for broke and be a colossal disaster internationally.
What a fraud-punk.
The EU needs war. They need cash, and war is the best way to raise cash. The EU economy is headed for a depression, and Germany's GDP is falling. Germany is the economic engine of the EU.
You mentioned this: it was only the in 20th century that the British ruling class started making really bad decisions,
A note of interest: The players who started WW One were Queen Victoria's grandchildren. Incest was rampant in Europe, especially in the UK. This helps explain the insane decisions that started the war.
How America got involved is another interesting subject; that story shows America was pulled into war illegally and by deception.
The Crown has arguably enslaved, starved, slaughtered and directly controlled and ruined the most people in history. Forcing Indians into slavery to grow Opium to force on the Chinese at gunpoint (cannons) to create millions of addicts and then when the Chinese Boxers rebelled the Chinese Boxers are made to look like the bad guys.
I don't believe the UK leadership the past 100 plus years has been incompetent as it is a strategy. What they did in Palestine and then Israel was controlled by the Rothschilds which got us to the disaster point we are in the Middle East today. It is by design.
“Is UK trying to drag the US into a world war?” Our expansion of NATO over the last 30 years, despite promises to the contrary seems an awful lot like our former presidents were trying to get into a world war. That is not easily undone.
Expecting the rest of the world to turn on a dime with a new administration that acts unpredictably, and says things to intentionally offend and stir up controversy, seems unrealistic.