Geoengineering expert Jim Lee joins epidemiologist Nicolas Hulscher to expose decades of atmospheric manipulation—just as over 25 states move to ban it.
Thank you for this! I've been so discouraged in continuing to see chemtrails all over our skies, but I'm encouraged because I've seen several articles and YouTube videos lately bringing it to the forefront. Keep up the great work!
Are you certain that what you are seeing are chemtrails and not contrails? There is a difference. LA has been known for its smog from the many autos pollluting the air. None of these contaminations are healthy. We can’t fly an electric jet, but, even if we could, the electricity required to charge the battery would have its own problems with pollution, just like EV cars.
Contrails are water vapor condensation trails that disappear very quickly behind the aircraft and not seen very often due to the new high-bypass turbofan engines that utilize air pass through for energy, which means less water vapor especially at the high altitudes commercial jets fly. Chemtrails are intentionally created with chemical mixtures and linger for very long periods of time until the sky is white. They are also all shapes and not in any particular pattern.
Has anyone looked into or considered that free aluminum (and lots of other fine particle metals) are HIGHLY flammable (see Thermite)? If people have been spraying more and more of this stuff over the years...and we've been seeing more and more MASSIVE WILDFIRES over the years...is it perhaps time to take a look for a possible correlation between spraying aluminum on everything and everything burning?
There is evidence of dying trees everywhere in Arizona (I live in Phoenix), and there are a number of studies about the increasing amount of aluminum in the soil and water. I've lost 2 large trees that have been in my yard to more than 30 years (they were full grown when I bought this house); they just quit growing and dry up. This is happening throughout this area. Aluminum in the soil inhibits nutrient uptake through the roots. My landscaper said he removes trees and shrubs from his clients' yards, puts in new ones and within weeks they are dead too. He pulled up one shrub I'd planted about a three years ago and it was beautiful. Last summer is just died all of a sudden -- just dried up and died (water doesn't help) and when my landscaper pulled it up, there were NO ROOT. Ionospheric heating is being done through various methods (HAARP, and others), and when the atmosphere is filled with aluminum particles, the sun's heat becomes very intense. We've noticed that here in Phoenix over the past few years. Of course it's hot in Phoenix, but this heat is very different -- very intense like it burns to even walk to the mailbox. I've noticed a distinct difference since I moved to Arizona 45 years ago. Check out Elana Freeland's latest book: The Geoengineered Transhumans in which she discusses this topic and more. She has (or had - if it's not been taken down) a really good documentary video with an arborist in California who inspects these massive "forest" (urban where there are not forests) fires in that state. Very interesting.
From an eternal POV, the enemy (which is what the word "ha satan" in Hebrew means) is trying one last stab at staying out of his fiery jail. If he can wipe out humanity - then he makes God's word via the prophets to be false. Of course he won't succeed, but things are going to get very rough.
As someone who has been studying this phenomenon of "chemtrails" vs. "vapor condensation trails" for the past 30 years, I have a number of questions for Mr. Lee, which I will write to him. He gave us some huge numbers about commercial flights and how they've increased dramatically, indicating that is why we're seeing "contrails" more now than we did 30 years ago or more. However, if that's true then why aren't there "vapor condensation trails" in the sky every day, all day? Why do we still see some actual "vapor condensation trails" at very high altitudes that disappear closely behind the aircraft -- but not many? Why do we see these "chemtrails" at lower altitudes, and in various shapes (I've seen circles!), and several laid down simultaneously in the same direction; some like a tic-tac-toe board -- not really following the Victor Airways (the highway in the sky for commercial aircraft) -- but are in every direction imaginable.
Why is it that "chemtrails" linger and spread slowly from their patterned configurations until the entire sky is white? On heavy spraying days, I've watched the sky go from clear blue, to dozens of trails crisscrossing the sky at fairly low altitudes to an entirely white sky in about two hours. I have hundreds of photos of the chemtrail phenomenon, and it's try amazing.
Today in Phoenix, we have a beautiful blue sky with actual natural puffy white clouds. We had rain yesterday evening and a lot of wind. March and April tend to be very windy in Arizona, and during those two months, we generally do not have many trails.
While I do believe that aircraft using Jet A fuel are responsible for putting a lot of particulates and dangerous metals/chemicals into the atmosphere, I think there is an intentional program being deployed. There are just too many anomalous things going on in the sky to write it off as just commercial aircraft carrying passengers and cargo, leaving stuff in the atmosphere as a by-product of the fuel they use. I think these are definitely more widespread today than 40 or 50 years ago when I was flying with my husband -- a pilot -- during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s. The early experiments with this in the 1940s and 50s were likely done is places near Air Force bases, where obviously people would see more activity in cloud creation. I believe what is going on today is intentional -- and not good intentions!
There's always more to the story, and observational details make a difference.
Dane Wiggington, national hero and founder of geoengineeringwatch.org is I think, the expert on this stuff and disagrees with this analysis. See the documentary The Dimming
I agree with you regarding Dane Wigginton. I too have taken hundreds of photographs of chemtrails, mainly in Southern France, where I live, coming from jets flying north over the Pyrenees. Some of my photographs are of the craziest geometric cloud formations I have ever seen. To me, these have to be created by electrically charged frozen particles/chemicals. They are invariably followed by weird cloud cover that lasts for days and weeks. The firefighters in California described trees during from the inside. To me that is due to the aluminum in the soil having fallen in the rain for years and now siphoning up the active centers of trees where they catch on fire that external dousing with water cannot extringuish. I also watch TV documentaries from around the world and see the same weird cloud cover in the skies from Siberia to the US to South America to Africa. A pilot friend of mine sent me a map of commercial flights over my area between Toulouse and the Pyrenees. It showed flights going north and south but almost none going east and west. Yet the chemtrails clearly show the same number of criss-crossing chemtrails in both directions. I also photographed the circling chemtrails off the coast of northern Spain. My vote is for Wigginton.
I have many photos as well in which the trails are circular, curvy and other strange shapes that just doesn't make sense that it's some commercial jet flying around. I've read that some of these are being created by large drones, which I can believe as they are much lower in altitude than commercial aircraft flying at 36,000 feet.
The East/West and North/South flight paths are the Victor airways -- the "road" in the sky for airplanes to travel without incident. Yes, the chemtrails are all over the place. Crazy!
I think the author is a supporter of this effort seen in a grant proposal called "Contrails Research Roadmap" (Jan 2025) in which NO mention of metals or chemicals are mentioned as a source or factor of "persistent spreading contrails".
The executive summary says: "Current models indicate that persistent spreading contrail cirrus has a significant net warming impact on the global climate..." and "only a small percentage of flights cause the majority of contrail induced warming".
I downloaded this extensive analysis but have only skimmed it. To me, it is copper-plated BS, meant to bamboozle. CO2-generated global warming is a hoax, in my opinion, initiated by two politicians, John Kerry and Al Gore, and endorsed by a teenager and billions of dollars. This analysis employs two classical manipulations: cherry picking and too-long-to-read text. I suggest J. Marvin Herndon, Ph.D. (Chemtrails are not Contrails, plus his website). Herndon is a retired university professor of physics who, among other things, developed a theory of planet formation -- including the earth -- that takes into account the earth's magnetic field, which the sliding technonic plate theory ignore!! According to Al Gore, the Hudson should be encroaching on the feet of the State of Liberty by now. Photographs from identical angles and distance show no change in the water level on the statue over 100 tears. But they're off again to yet another climate conference in Brazil to be attended by 20,000 people. To make it easier for the attendees, they are building a four lane highway straight through the Amazon Jungle. Go figure...
Dane lives on the west coast, up near Shasta or Lassen, from what I've gathered. Where would all that fly ash come from? China? I saw a video recently which suggested that an additive to jet fuel to increase combustion efficiency was the reason for the chemicals as well.
Personally, I find it hard to believe that with all the regulations in the US, that these additives would have been allowed to pollute the US (and world) as they have. I have also seen the testimony of a young lady who used to order chemicals for an Air Force unit that used it during flights. She started to ask questions and was ultimately reassigned before being drummed out of the service. She saw things purposefully being done to avoid disclosure and also avoidance of safety standards.
I spend quite a bit of time online listening to analyses of health, economic, and political issues. I favor "experts" who do not have conflicts of interest, as much as possible. After reading Judy Wood's book Where Did the Towers Go?, having believed the official story or 9/11, I totally realized that I am just as vulnerable to propaganda as anyone. I even supported the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. I live in France and speak the language fluently. Propaganda is not confined to China, Russia, or the US, I am sorry to say. Here in France, even among my educated friends, no one, to this day, has ever heard of Tony Fauci. Yet they all got the jab and happily complied with all the lockdown nonsense.
You mention chemicals in the con-/chem-trails. Wigginton claims to have found the same chemicals as those mentioned in the article sent by Eddy. So where do they come from? Herndon claims they come from the coal fly ash of coal-powered plants. They are captured by static electricity technology before exiting the chimneys, thus reducing pollution. (Trump's "clean coal"?). Once captured, the fly ash is packaged and sold to the chemtrail guys who put them in the jet fuel.
I find Dane Wigington far more credible. He has video where he and scientists rented plane and sampled and tested all of the chemicals and minerals being spewed out. Very important.
Jim is controlled opposition. On the one hand it's all good and nothing but your imagination. On the other it's bad and affecting our health as well as the health of plants, trees, and animals. There is no climate change due to CO2. Climate manipulation is responsible for the climate extremes we see. The more time wasted on dithering, the more the destruction of the planet continues.
Now that people are finally ALLOWED to talk about this on public platforms, here's this paper that gives lie to all the climate change disinformation. It should gain traction. But then, what would happen to all the NGOs making bazillions of dollars and the Bill Gates of the world who want to control everything and everybody? Here's the paper. I'd like to see someone like Jim Lee try to debunk it.
Have read six books on the climate, three in English and three in French. The French author, a physicist, explains the impossibility of a lone CO2 molecule absorbing a photon increasing the temperature of the 250 other non-CO2 molecules that surround it. Just can't happen!
Suggest you look deeper. Most of Dane's "goods" are easily debunked including his statements saying "persistent contrails don't exist". His first complaint to Shasta county was that "Persistent Contrails" were affecting his solar panels.
He lived and learned then, didn't he? No need to argue among ourselves. We already have an unbeatable and indomitable foe. We the people and the earth will not win this. I still stand with Dane.
So, please tell me why the Pyrenees mountains "grow" by 2 cm each year, and what is causing the long fault occurring in southeastern Africa, not to mention similar faults that filled with water and became what we call oceans. According to Herndon, it's a rebound expansion phenomenon responding to the gravity-driven collapse of the gas giant the earth was during its early formation, as Jupiter is today. Decaying uranium is part of the earth. Its radioactive energy heats the iron that surrounds it. That molten iron is hotter at its center than at its periphery, giving rise to convection currents, i.e. circulating charged Fe++ ions, and constantly moving/circulating charged ions give off what we call magnetism. This "nuclear reactor" theory explains our magnetic field. The standard theory of the force behind continental drift does not.
Speaking of geo-engineering, I suggest reading this thought-provoking new essay by Joshua Stylman in which he proposes an underlying reason connecting many things that are happening—from geo-engineering, mRNA, and 6G, to CBDCs, EMFs, smart dust, and neuro-nano-robots. Read through to the end, and peruse his amazing list of references and resources.
Thanks to everyone bringing these issues to light.
Check out the book “The Brothers Vonnegut: Science and Fiction in the House of Magic” about Kurt and his brother Bernard working at GE where much of the pioneering work in Weather modification was done. Bernard was a scientist, Kurt a PR flack
practically everyone wants to believe that the climate can be manipulated, this is the real phenomenon that has been happening for more than 10 years, no one has asked why no cyclone or hurricane has been blocked, or why no volcanic eruption has emitted enough to obscure the sun for years.
Maybe we want to believe that technology has immense power and that it would be enough to take this power away from lying and murderous governments, to change things, but this is playing the game of all those governments that amuse themselves and enjoy our credulity, while we attribute to them a divine (biblical) power that ultimately increases their power.
There are 2 very robust arguments scientifically more solid than the many reports and reports all more or less historical and quantity of patents as if the patents were super peer reviewed science, everything that is shown to us is nothing more than a list of intentions without there having been a single measurable effect,
The first argument is thermodynamic,
to make it rain or not to make it rain, against natural causes, the mass of vapor to condense or to maintain in a vapor state requires energy and even chemical energy is always proportional to the mass and in our case with masses (not relativistic) such as substances capable of chemical reactions, the energy needed is enormous, giving or taking away enormous energy requires enormous quantities of mass, which cannot be transported by plane.
It is easy to calculate that starting from already formed clouds that a medium heavy rain of 10 mm/m2/h on a limited area of 10x 10 km (1 million tons of water) requires a cooling energy to be removed from the cloud vapor of 631 Gigawh (631 hours of operation of a 1000 MW power plant).
If the mass of substance needed to capture this energy were for example dry ice it would be 3.6 million tons to be chopped and spread very well inside the clouds, or if the substance used had a chemical reaction at the limit efficient like the combustion of methane when it is perfectly mixed with air, and this energy could be converted into cooling with 100% efficiency, then it would be necessary to transport and spread 45,000 tons (45*10^3 tons) of substance.
It is clear that by intervening locally on the energy you do not get anywhere and thermodynamics is a very robust physics.
2) Suppose that controlling the climate is instead reducible to the identification of very limited particular zones, zones necessarily distant in space and time from where one wants to control the climate, zones where our nonlinear differential equations full of deterministic chaos had highlighted very appropriate initial conditions and very special moments so that the energy to trigger events and atmospheric changes was thousands of times less than the enormously larger energies that one would like to control.
It occurs to me that we would need to have developed a determinism (mathematical model) between cause and effect so sure and certain almost as if it were the certain determinism of a large-caliber weapon between the energy to be impressed on a trigger and that of the shot enormous compared to that impressed on the trigger.
It is clear that in this case our forecasting calculation systems should be many times more precise and accurate and fast in their predictions, and the interventions extremely timely and targeted especially for the necessary distance of space and time from the phenomenon to be controlled, something completely different from the current models and detection systems and from the interventions that we imagine as such.
To achieve the safety and predictability that we would need, in a system instead governed by a chaos that we know is apparent, the desire for a better interpretation than the current one is not enough, we would need mathematical models and detections of the meteorological conditions very accurate that it is evident do not have this certainty or capacity to identify the initial conditions to be modified.
Once upon a time there was a saying "a flap of a butterfly's wings in India could trigger a hurricane in the United States", yes but it was to show how the initial conditions in a complex system of equations (which supposes to model the real) can have solutions or results absolutely not comparable to the initial conditions, that possibility was immersed in a sea of space-time uncertainty both for the physical-mathematical modeling and for the measurements.
I repeat the most damaging phenomenon is that many people are attracted by what for governments is propaganda such as a loop for which they are made to believe that it is sprayed for one purpose i.e. to control the climate but instead the purpose is another.
a biblical power that does not exist is believed to be addressable.
Water vapor girl here just got educated: it’s JA1 jet fuel exhaust x 100,000 jets a day over the USA and rains down a bunch of chemicals on us whether there are contrails or not (which is a function of atmospheric conditions). Another reason I’ll keep working towards that simple non-materialistic, no home delivery, life and buy locally grown food; so as not to become part of the problem. Judging from other’s comments, just FYI - I came to this conclusion by listening to the entire podcast. It’s worth it. And yeah, I miss the air quality we had in 2020-22. I no longer see the Milky Way and am sad that the rat race is reigning supreme and wiping out the sky.
Jim Lee is a smart cookie. I can sympathize with those who consider him a CIA shill, because, like Calley Means, he appears to come out of nowhere and also appears to be able to debate anyone, at any time, and come out on top.
But at the end he trashed the CIA enough, with both language and demeanor, and that made be believe him. Yes, it is true, sometimes covert operatives deliberately trash their paymasters in order to get in close, but Jim seems like the real deal.
I like how he argued to get the metals out of jet fuel, but I wish he talked more about the release of magnetic particles, like iron, things which could make us all electro-sensitive (increasing the adverse effects we experience when in an electro-magnetic field).
If thinking of having him back, I think it'd be "fun" to watch him talk about directed-energy weapons, like when he introduced a teaser regarding how China used them on troops in India.
Has Jim Lee ever debated Dane Wiggington? I am trying to understand differences. I realize DW focuses a lot on "chem" vs. "con" trails. Your point that contrails are dangerous also seems very important. If there has never been a debate, why not? and if one is not possible is there anyway to summarize the say top 5 or 10 key differences.
Even if individual states ban geoengineering, they don’t have a wall in their skies to prevent stuff being sprayed in the atmosphere by neighboring states to blow over their state. This requires a worldwide ban.
Thank you for this! I've been so discouraged in continuing to see chemtrails all over our skies, but I'm encouraged because I've seen several articles and YouTube videos lately bringing it to the forefront. Keep up the great work!
Are you certain that what you are seeing are chemtrails and not contrails? There is a difference. LA has been known for its smog from the many autos pollluting the air. None of these contaminations are healthy. We can’t fly an electric jet, but, even if we could, the electricity required to charge the battery would have its own problems with pollution, just like EV cars.
Contrails are water vapor condensation trails that disappear very quickly behind the aircraft and not seen very often due to the new high-bypass turbofan engines that utilize air pass through for energy, which means less water vapor especially at the high altitudes commercial jets fly. Chemtrails are intentionally created with chemical mixtures and linger for very long periods of time until the sky is white. They are also all shapes and not in any particular pattern.
Has anyone looked into or considered that free aluminum (and lots of other fine particle metals) are HIGHLY flammable (see Thermite)? If people have been spraying more and more of this stuff over the years...and we've been seeing more and more MASSIVE WILDFIRES over the years...is it perhaps time to take a look for a possible correlation between spraying aluminum on everything and everything burning?
What is needed are tree specialists who can explain why the trees are dying (& being infested) and the link to this spraying.
There is evidence of dying trees everywhere in Arizona (I live in Phoenix), and there are a number of studies about the increasing amount of aluminum in the soil and water. I've lost 2 large trees that have been in my yard to more than 30 years (they were full grown when I bought this house); they just quit growing and dry up. This is happening throughout this area. Aluminum in the soil inhibits nutrient uptake through the roots. My landscaper said he removes trees and shrubs from his clients' yards, puts in new ones and within weeks they are dead too. He pulled up one shrub I'd planted about a three years ago and it was beautiful. Last summer is just died all of a sudden -- just dried up and died (water doesn't help) and when my landscaper pulled it up, there were NO ROOT. Ionospheric heating is being done through various methods (HAARP, and others), and when the atmosphere is filled with aluminum particles, the sun's heat becomes very intense. We've noticed that here in Phoenix over the past few years. Of course it's hot in Phoenix, but this heat is very different -- very intense like it burns to even walk to the mailbox. I've noticed a distinct difference since I moved to Arizona 45 years ago. Check out Elana Freeland's latest book: The Geoengineered Transhumans in which she discusses this topic and more. She has (or had - if it's not been taken down) a really good documentary video with an arborist in California who inspects these massive "forest" (urban where there are not forests) fires in that state. Very interesting.
From an eternal POV, the enemy (which is what the word "ha satan" in Hebrew means) is trying one last stab at staying out of his fiery jail. If he can wipe out humanity - then he makes God's word via the prophets to be false. Of course he won't succeed, but things are going to get very rough.
Mr. Hulscher,
THANK YOU for continuing to provide EXCELLENT information regarding the EVIL methods being inflicted upon us so we can take action to STOP IT!
As someone who has been studying this phenomenon of "chemtrails" vs. "vapor condensation trails" for the past 30 years, I have a number of questions for Mr. Lee, which I will write to him. He gave us some huge numbers about commercial flights and how they've increased dramatically, indicating that is why we're seeing "contrails" more now than we did 30 years ago or more. However, if that's true then why aren't there "vapor condensation trails" in the sky every day, all day? Why do we still see some actual "vapor condensation trails" at very high altitudes that disappear closely behind the aircraft -- but not many? Why do we see these "chemtrails" at lower altitudes, and in various shapes (I've seen circles!), and several laid down simultaneously in the same direction; some like a tic-tac-toe board -- not really following the Victor Airways (the highway in the sky for commercial aircraft) -- but are in every direction imaginable.
Why is it that "chemtrails" linger and spread slowly from their patterned configurations until the entire sky is white? On heavy spraying days, I've watched the sky go from clear blue, to dozens of trails crisscrossing the sky at fairly low altitudes to an entirely white sky in about two hours. I have hundreds of photos of the chemtrail phenomenon, and it's try amazing.
Today in Phoenix, we have a beautiful blue sky with actual natural puffy white clouds. We had rain yesterday evening and a lot of wind. March and April tend to be very windy in Arizona, and during those two months, we generally do not have many trails.
While I do believe that aircraft using Jet A fuel are responsible for putting a lot of particulates and dangerous metals/chemicals into the atmosphere, I think there is an intentional program being deployed. There are just too many anomalous things going on in the sky to write it off as just commercial aircraft carrying passengers and cargo, leaving stuff in the atmosphere as a by-product of the fuel they use. I think these are definitely more widespread today than 40 or 50 years ago when I was flying with my husband -- a pilot -- during the 1960s, 70s, and 80s. The early experiments with this in the 1940s and 50s were likely done is places near Air Force bases, where obviously people would see more activity in cloud creation. I believe what is going on today is intentional -- and not good intentions!
There's always more to the story, and observational details make a difference.
Dane Wiggington, national hero and founder of geoengineeringwatch.org is I think, the expert on this stuff and disagrees with this analysis. See the documentary The Dimming
I agree with you regarding Dane Wigginton. I too have taken hundreds of photographs of chemtrails, mainly in Southern France, where I live, coming from jets flying north over the Pyrenees. Some of my photographs are of the craziest geometric cloud formations I have ever seen. To me, these have to be created by electrically charged frozen particles/chemicals. They are invariably followed by weird cloud cover that lasts for days and weeks. The firefighters in California described trees during from the inside. To me that is due to the aluminum in the soil having fallen in the rain for years and now siphoning up the active centers of trees where they catch on fire that external dousing with water cannot extringuish. I also watch TV documentaries from around the world and see the same weird cloud cover in the skies from Siberia to the US to South America to Africa. A pilot friend of mine sent me a map of commercial flights over my area between Toulouse and the Pyrenees. It showed flights going north and south but almost none going east and west. Yet the chemtrails clearly show the same number of criss-crossing chemtrails in both directions. I also photographed the circling chemtrails off the coast of northern Spain. My vote is for Wigginton.
I have many photos as well in which the trails are circular, curvy and other strange shapes that just doesn't make sense that it's some commercial jet flying around. I've read that some of these are being created by large drones, which I can believe as they are much lower in altitude than commercial aircraft flying at 36,000 feet.
The East/West and North/South flight paths are the Victor airways -- the "road" in the sky for airplanes to travel without incident. Yes, the chemtrails are all over the place. Crazy!
I think the author is a supporter of this effort seen in a grant proposal called "Contrails Research Roadmap" (Jan 2025) in which NO mention of metals or chemicals are mentioned as a source or factor of "persistent spreading contrails".
The executive summary says: "Current models indicate that persistent spreading contrail cirrus has a significant net warming impact on the global climate..." and "only a small percentage of flights cause the majority of contrail induced warming".
I'm sorry. This proposal hides what's really going on, and allows it to continue under false pretenses. It's put together by the FAA, NASA and NOAA. See this proposal here: https://www.faa.gov/about/office_org/headquarters_offices/apl/contrails/contrails_research_roadmap.pdf
I downloaded this extensive analysis but have only skimmed it. To me, it is copper-plated BS, meant to bamboozle. CO2-generated global warming is a hoax, in my opinion, initiated by two politicians, John Kerry and Al Gore, and endorsed by a teenager and billions of dollars. This analysis employs two classical manipulations: cherry picking and too-long-to-read text. I suggest J. Marvin Herndon, Ph.D. (Chemtrails are not Contrails, plus his website). Herndon is a retired university professor of physics who, among other things, developed a theory of planet formation -- including the earth -- that takes into account the earth's magnetic field, which the sliding technonic plate theory ignore!! According to Al Gore, the Hudson should be encroaching on the feet of the State of Liberty by now. Photographs from identical angles and distance show no change in the water level on the statue over 100 tears. But they're off again to yet another climate conference in Brazil to be attended by 20,000 people. To make it easier for the attendees, they are building a four lane highway straight through the Amazon Jungle. Go figure...
Dane lives on the west coast, up near Shasta or Lassen, from what I've gathered. Where would all that fly ash come from? China? I saw a video recently which suggested that an additive to jet fuel to increase combustion efficiency was the reason for the chemicals as well.
Personally, I find it hard to believe that with all the regulations in the US, that these additives would have been allowed to pollute the US (and world) as they have. I have also seen the testimony of a young lady who used to order chemicals for an Air Force unit that used it during flights. She started to ask questions and was ultimately reassigned before being drummed out of the service. She saw things purposefully being done to avoid disclosure and also avoidance of safety standards.
I spend quite a bit of time online listening to analyses of health, economic, and political issues. I favor "experts" who do not have conflicts of interest, as much as possible. After reading Judy Wood's book Where Did the Towers Go?, having believed the official story or 9/11, I totally realized that I am just as vulnerable to propaganda as anyone. I even supported the invasions of Afghanistan and Iraq. I live in France and speak the language fluently. Propaganda is not confined to China, Russia, or the US, I am sorry to say. Here in France, even among my educated friends, no one, to this day, has ever heard of Tony Fauci. Yet they all got the jab and happily complied with all the lockdown nonsense.
You mention chemicals in the con-/chem-trails. Wigginton claims to have found the same chemicals as those mentioned in the article sent by Eddy. So where do they come from? Herndon claims they come from the coal fly ash of coal-powered plants. They are captured by static electricity technology before exiting the chimneys, thus reducing pollution. (Trump's "clean coal"?). Once captured, the fly ash is packaged and sold to the chemtrail guys who put them in the jet fuel.
I find Dane Wigington far more credible. He has video where he and scientists rented plane and sampled and tested all of the chemicals and minerals being spewed out. Very important.
He says he rented a plane from NOAA to sample chemtrails.
Do you believe that is true?
Perhaps you have some cognitive dissonance.
Jim is controlled opposition. On the one hand it's all good and nothing but your imagination. On the other it's bad and affecting our health as well as the health of plants, trees, and animals. There is no climate change due to CO2. Climate manipulation is responsible for the climate extremes we see. The more time wasted on dithering, the more the destruction of the planet continues.
Now that people are finally ALLOWED to talk about this on public platforms, here's this paper that gives lie to all the climate change disinformation. It should gain traction. But then, what would happen to all the NGOs making bazillions of dollars and the Bill Gates of the world who want to control everything and everybody? Here's the paper. I'd like to see someone like Jim Lee try to debunk it.
https://scienceofclimatechange.org/wp-content/uploads/SCC-Grok-3-Review-V5-1.pdf
Downloaded it. Thanks.
Have read six books on the climate, three in English and three in French. The French author, a physicist, explains the impossibility of a lone CO2 molecule absorbing a photon increasing the temperature of the 250 other non-CO2 molecules that surround it. Just can't happen!
like. My like button doesn't work.
Why don't you ask Jim. I think you'll find he agrees. All that information is on his website.
Jim Lee is out to confuse the issue. I think he is paid controlled opposition. Dane Wigington has the goods.
Suggest you look deeper. Most of Dane's "goods" are easily debunked including his statements saying "persistent contrails don't exist". His first complaint to Shasta county was that "Persistent Contrails" were affecting his solar panels.
The document is on his website.
He lived and learned then, didn't he? No need to argue among ourselves. We already have an unbeatable and indomitable foe. We the people and the earth will not win this. I still stand with Dane.
Read Chemtrails are not Contrails by physicist Marvin Herndon.
Try a scientist that actually studies atmospheric physics.
https://acp.copernicus.org/articles/24/6071/2024/
A physicist in Geology, great.
He also believes the centre of the earth is a nuclear reactor.
So, please tell me why the Pyrenees mountains "grow" by 2 cm each year, and what is causing the long fault occurring in southeastern Africa, not to mention similar faults that filled with water and became what we call oceans. According to Herndon, it's a rebound expansion phenomenon responding to the gravity-driven collapse of the gas giant the earth was during its early formation, as Jupiter is today. Decaying uranium is part of the earth. Its radioactive energy heats the iron that surrounds it. That molten iron is hotter at its center than at its periphery, giving rise to convection currents, i.e. circulating charged Fe++ ions, and constantly moving/circulating charged ions give off what we call magnetism. This "nuclear reactor" theory explains our magnetic field. The standard theory of the force behind continental drift does not.
Jim Lee is, quite frankly, the climate guy!
Speaking of geo-engineering, I suggest reading this thought-provoking new essay by Joshua Stylman in which he proposes an underlying reason connecting many things that are happening—from geo-engineering, mRNA, and 6G, to CBDCs, EMFs, smart dust, and neuro-nano-robots. Read through to the end, and peruse his amazing list of references and resources.
Thanks to everyone bringing these issues to light.
https://stylman.substack.com/p/node-without-consent
Check out the book “The Brothers Vonnegut: Science and Fiction in the House of Magic” about Kurt and his brother Bernard working at GE where much of the pioneering work in Weather modification was done. Bernard was a scientist, Kurt a PR flack
I have never heard that Kurt was involved. He would have known about it for sure, hence books like Cat's Cradle, Player Piano.
practically everyone wants to believe that the climate can be manipulated, this is the real phenomenon that has been happening for more than 10 years, no one has asked why no cyclone or hurricane has been blocked, or why no volcanic eruption has emitted enough to obscure the sun for years.
Maybe we want to believe that technology has immense power and that it would be enough to take this power away from lying and murderous governments, to change things, but this is playing the game of all those governments that amuse themselves and enjoy our credulity, while we attribute to them a divine (biblical) power that ultimately increases their power.
There are 2 very robust arguments scientifically more solid than the many reports and reports all more or less historical and quantity of patents as if the patents were super peer reviewed science, everything that is shown to us is nothing more than a list of intentions without there having been a single measurable effect,
The first argument is thermodynamic,
to make it rain or not to make it rain, against natural causes, the mass of vapor to condense or to maintain in a vapor state requires energy and even chemical energy is always proportional to the mass and in our case with masses (not relativistic) such as substances capable of chemical reactions, the energy needed is enormous, giving or taking away enormous energy requires enormous quantities of mass, which cannot be transported by plane.
It is easy to calculate that starting from already formed clouds that a medium heavy rain of 10 mm/m2/h on a limited area of 10x 10 km (1 million tons of water) requires a cooling energy to be removed from the cloud vapor of 631 Gigawh (631 hours of operation of a 1000 MW power plant).
If the mass of substance needed to capture this energy were for example dry ice it would be 3.6 million tons to be chopped and spread very well inside the clouds, or if the substance used had a chemical reaction at the limit efficient like the combustion of methane when it is perfectly mixed with air, and this energy could be converted into cooling with 100% efficiency, then it would be necessary to transport and spread 45,000 tons (45*10^3 tons) of substance.
It is clear that by intervening locally on the energy you do not get anywhere and thermodynamics is a very robust physics.
2) Suppose that controlling the climate is instead reducible to the identification of very limited particular zones, zones necessarily distant in space and time from where one wants to control the climate, zones where our nonlinear differential equations full of deterministic chaos had highlighted very appropriate initial conditions and very special moments so that the energy to trigger events and atmospheric changes was thousands of times less than the enormously larger energies that one would like to control.
It occurs to me that we would need to have developed a determinism (mathematical model) between cause and effect so sure and certain almost as if it were the certain determinism of a large-caliber weapon between the energy to be impressed on a trigger and that of the shot enormous compared to that impressed on the trigger.
It is clear that in this case our forecasting calculation systems should be many times more precise and accurate and fast in their predictions, and the interventions extremely timely and targeted especially for the necessary distance of space and time from the phenomenon to be controlled, something completely different from the current models and detection systems and from the interventions that we imagine as such.
To achieve the safety and predictability that we would need, in a system instead governed by a chaos that we know is apparent, the desire for a better interpretation than the current one is not enough, we would need mathematical models and detections of the meteorological conditions very accurate that it is evident do not have this certainty or capacity to identify the initial conditions to be modified.
Once upon a time there was a saying "a flap of a butterfly's wings in India could trigger a hurricane in the United States", yes but it was to show how the initial conditions in a complex system of equations (which supposes to model the real) can have solutions or results absolutely not comparable to the initial conditions, that possibility was immersed in a sea of space-time uncertainty both for the physical-mathematical modeling and for the measurements.
I repeat the most damaging phenomenon is that many people are attracted by what for governments is propaganda such as a loop for which they are made to believe that it is sprayed for one purpose i.e. to control the climate but instead the purpose is another.
a biblical power that does not exist is believed to be addressable.
Water vapor girl here just got educated: it’s JA1 jet fuel exhaust x 100,000 jets a day over the USA and rains down a bunch of chemicals on us whether there are contrails or not (which is a function of atmospheric conditions). Another reason I’ll keep working towards that simple non-materialistic, no home delivery, life and buy locally grown food; so as not to become part of the problem. Judging from other’s comments, just FYI - I came to this conclusion by listening to the entire podcast. It’s worth it. And yeah, I miss the air quality we had in 2020-22. I no longer see the Milky Way and am sad that the rat race is reigning supreme and wiping out the sky.
https://t.me/climateviewerchat
Good information here, Nic.
Jim Lee is a smart cookie. I can sympathize with those who consider him a CIA shill, because, like Calley Means, he appears to come out of nowhere and also appears to be able to debate anyone, at any time, and come out on top.
But at the end he trashed the CIA enough, with both language and demeanor, and that made be believe him. Yes, it is true, sometimes covert operatives deliberately trash their paymasters in order to get in close, but Jim seems like the real deal.
I like how he argued to get the metals out of jet fuel, but I wish he talked more about the release of magnetic particles, like iron, things which could make us all electro-sensitive (increasing the adverse effects we experience when in an electro-magnetic field).
If thinking of having him back, I think it'd be "fun" to watch him talk about directed-energy weapons, like when he introduced a teaser regarding how China used them on troops in India.
Has Jim Lee ever debated Dane Wiggington? I am trying to understand differences. I realize DW focuses a lot on "chem" vs. "con" trails. Your point that contrails are dangerous also seems very important. If there has never been a debate, why not? and if one is not possible is there anyway to summarize the say top 5 or 10 key differences.
Dane won't do it, he's been asked many times.
One difference is Dane believes High by-pass jet engines can't make contrails. They actually make more.
Dane believes CO2 and Methane are causing climate change.
Dane fakes or misrepresents photos claiming pumps and pipes in "Chemtrail Planes".
Even if individual states ban geoengineering, they don’t have a wall in their skies to prevent stuff being sprayed in the atmosphere by neighboring states to blow over their state. This requires a worldwide ban.
Good point. Hopefully neighboring state populations will wake up too.