The most ironic & evil part is that even though the mRNA gene-altering injections did not work & were downright dangerous & often lethal, is that they are building mRNA factories by the dozens - especially in Canada & Japan. They have no intention of stopping this platform. They intend to make nearly all of the upcoming "vaccines" mRNA, …
The most ironic & evil part is that even though the mRNA gene-altering injections did not work & were downright dangerous & often lethal, is that they are building mRNA factories by the dozens - especially in Canada & Japan. They have no intention of stopping this platform. They intend to make nearly all of the upcoming "vaccines" mRNA, including the new EUA Bird Flu "vaccine". They obviously do not care how many people they injure or kill. Simply put, the body was not supposed to produce foreign proteins (as Dr. Ryan Cole has so astutely pointed out) & the lipid nano-particles are themselves, dangerous. They are highly inflammatory & cationic & cross the blood brain barrier, as well as the placental barrier. They are a recipe for disaster. Keep in mind too, that inflammation is a driver of cancer.
Wow! You nailed it. The modRNA platform is now the gold standard for the future of injectable vaccines. NO ONE in a position of authority is stopping this anti-health paradigm. The only hope is that individuals will refuse to be bamboozled by fear, coercion, mandates, and baleful medicine.
Best way to start is to correctly identify them as mRNA TRANSFECTIONS decades old failed replacement for chemo that has less than 1% of toxins delivered to the desired location & inventor of LNP Pieter Cullis explained w commentary @ 43 or 53 going by memory lol.. Nobel speech deconstructed to real people biology lessons by brilliant teacher Jay Couey last year Study Hall session <3
Re "the body was not supposed to produce foreign proteins"
Indeed, and the same applies to plants. GM crops are those that have been genetic engineered to produce one or a few (generally bacterial-origin) proteins. No GM plant is better than its parents, typically shorter, more prone to disease.
True but why let a lifetime of failure derail a perfect privatizing scheme & expanded population wide GMO trials that began with Monsanto believes & morphed to Rockefeller Gates WHO know better than we lab rats how their gene experiments benefit us and manifest cash cows for the visionaries!
Biotechnology Consultation Memorandum of Conference BNF No. 000001
September 19, 1994
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
The most ironic & evil part is that even though the mRNA gene-altering injections did not work & were downright dangerous & often lethal, is that they are building mRNA factories by the dozens - especially in Canada & Japan. They have no intention of stopping this platform. They intend to make nearly all of the upcoming "vaccines" mRNA, including the new EUA Bird Flu "vaccine". They obviously do not care how many people they injure or kill. Simply put, the body was not supposed to produce foreign proteins (as Dr. Ryan Cole has so astutely pointed out) & the lipid nano-particles are themselves, dangerous. They are highly inflammatory & cationic & cross the blood brain barrier, as well as the placental barrier. They are a recipe for disaster. Keep in mind too, that inflammation is a driver of cancer.
Wow! You nailed it. The modRNA platform is now the gold standard for the future of injectable vaccines. NO ONE in a position of authority is stopping this anti-health paradigm. The only hope is that individuals will refuse to be bamboozled by fear, coercion, mandates, and baleful medicine.
Best way to start is to correctly identify them as mRNA TRANSFECTIONS decades old failed replacement for chemo that has less than 1% of toxins delivered to the desired location & inventor of LNP Pieter Cullis explained w commentary @ 43 or 53 going by memory lol.. Nobel speech deconstructed to real people biology lessons by brilliant teacher Jay Couey last year Study Hall session <3
https://rumble.com/v3q5vbq-2023-10-17-pieter-cullis-2022-study-hall-16-oct-2023-brief-twitch1953665426.html
Re "the body was not supposed to produce foreign proteins"
Indeed, and the same applies to plants. GM crops are those that have been genetic engineered to produce one or a few (generally bacterial-origin) proteins. No GM plant is better than its parents, typically shorter, more prone to disease.
True but why let a lifetime of failure derail a perfect privatizing scheme & expanded population wide GMO trials that began with Monsanto believes & morphed to Rockefeller Gates WHO know better than we lab rats how their gene experiments benefit us and manifest cash cows for the visionaries!
https://web.archive.org/web/20101122021318/www.fda.gov/Food/Biotechnology/Submissions/ucm161130.htm
Biotechnology Consultation Memorandum of Conference BNF No. 000001
September 19, 1994
Wholesomeness Studies
Monsanto described the results of wholesomeness studies they carried out in rats, chickens, catfish, dairy cattle, and bobwhite quail. On the basis of their consideration of the totality of these studies, Monsanto has concluded that there is no significant difference in the wholesomeness of glyphosate-tolerant and traditional soybean varieties, as expected from their compositional analysis. These data are summarized on page 49 of Monsanto's September 2 submission.
Conclusions
Monsanto has concluded, in essence, that the glyphosate-tolerant soybean variety they have developed is not significantly altered within the meaning of 21 CFR 170.30(f)(2) when compared to soybean varieties with a history of safe use. At this time, based on Monsanto's description of its data and analysis, the agency considers Monsanto's consultation on this product to be complete.
F. Owen Fields, Ph.D.
Page Last Updated: 06/18/2009
Regulation? "According to Monsanto".