In my view, they’re doing they’d darnedest to make sure you regard this event EXACTLY as they want you to. Specifically, that there WAS a novel virus (I’m not alone in originally believing that myself, but over time, I’ve seen sufficient evidence that casts severe doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup…
In my view, they’re doing they’d darnedest to make sure you regard this event EXACTLY as they want you to.
Specifically, that there WAS a novel virus (I’m not alone in originally believing that myself, but over time, I’ve seen sufficient evidence that casts severe doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d’etat, I have put myself in the position as the seniormost, hidden perpetrators. In Q&A, they’d learn that the effects of a released, novel pathogen simply couldn’t be predicted accurately. It might burn out rapidly. Or, it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, collapsing advanced civilizations. Those top decision makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is simply intolerable to them. The crave total control & the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action. “No, we’re not going to do this. Come back with a plan with very much reduced uncertainty on outcomes”. The alternative that I think they’ve used is to add one more lie to the tall stack of lies which has surrounded this entire affair. The lie is that there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus which, crucially, caused massive scale illness and deaths.
Instead, they simply TOLD us there was this frightening, novel pathogen & ramped up the stress-inducing fear porn to 11 & held it there. Cheating about genetic sequences, PCR test protocols (probes, primers, amplification and annealing conditions, cycles, ignoring contaminating genetic materials from not only human and claimed viral sources, but also bacterial and fungal sources. Why did they insert the sampling sticks right into our sinuses? Was it to maximise non-human genetic sequences?
Notice the soft evidence that our wondrous leaders, including Queen Elizabeth II, were happy to meet & greet one another, without testing, masking or social distancing. They had no fear. In the scenario above, a few people would known there was no new hazard in their environment. If there really was a lethal pathogen stalking the land, I don’t believe they’ve the courage to act nonchalantly and risk exposure.
Most convincingly, for me at least, is the all causes mortality data by state, sex, age & date of occurrence, as analysed by Denis Rancourt and colleagues. The patterns of increased ACM is inconsistent with the presence of a novel, respiratory virus as the main cause.
If I’m correct, what a genius move if was merely to pretend there was
They want you ONLY to consider how said virus got into the human population. Was it a natural emergence (you know, a wild, horseshoe bat bit an innocent pangolin & this ended up being sold out of a wet market in Wuhan) or was it hubristically created by a Chinese researcher, enabled, along the way, by a dastardly researcher at UNC, making an end run around a presidential pause on such work?
Then there’s the frisson on the question as to whether the arrival of this “killer virus” in the general public was down to carelessness and a lab leak, or did someone deliberately spread it?
I close by pointing out that the perpetrators have hermetic control of the mass media. That’s why they’ve found it so easy to censor people like me. If a story appears on multiple TV networks, it’s because they’re either OK with it or they actively planted it, it won’t be genuine. I don’t think they’ve told the truth since this coup began.
I believe I’ve established that the perpetrators planted the controversy about origins of SARS-CoV-2, because a little embarrassment of the establishment was a small price to pay in order to persuade most of us that there surely must be a novel virus when, in fact, there isn’t.
I have colleagues who do not believe what we’ve been told has happened is even possible technologically. I don’t have the background to be able to assess that idea. But the rest hangs together for me in a way that no other explanation does.
In closing, I’m not saying people weren’t sick or that they didn’t die in huge numbers. I’m arguing only about the causes of illnesses and deaths. They were made such & sone killed by all the pre-existing causes, amplified by fear, resulting immunosuppression & then a swath of revolting actions. They chopped antibiotic prescriptions by 50% durujg 2020. They endured very large numbers of frail elderly people were mechanically ventilated, a procedure which, in such subjects, is close to contraindicated. They were administered renal toxin, remdesivir. They were given midazolam and morphine, synergistic respiratory depressant drugs which are also all but contradicted in patients with breathing difficulties.
The main reason for the lies about the novel virus is total predictability and control, with the intention to begin dismantling modern society with lockdowns and furlough. The immediate practical goal was to inject as many people as possible with materials designed not to induce immunity, but to cause injury, maiming and death.
The chickens are coming home to roost, right now in the banking system.
As I always say, I cannot know much for sure, and this is among them. I don’t have a copy of the script. By the way, whatever it actually is, I don’t believe what they called influenza disappeared conveniently in early 2020.
Dear Dr. Yeadon, Many thanks for sharing your comments. I am finally settling back into a normal desk routine after months of frequent travel. As I mentioned a few months ago, I would like to interview you, and will be in touch with you directly about setting up a time. Best regards, John
If you started your own substack, you would instantly have thousands of subscribers.
There are so many of us who have been saying exactly what you just said but we are unknown nobodies, we don't have the clout you have, the expertise, control over the technical language.
I came to the same conclusions because of two reasons, one, I listened to the experts who disagreed with the narrative, and two, I am an expert in history, and I am not alone, anyone with an honest take on our past smelled a rat from the get go.
We just needed people like you to fill in the blanks. Like how one can not see a black hole, only its impact on surrounding bodies, we could see that, but you can see the black hole.
Your perspective is vital. I hope you consider publishing your thoughts on your own page, and don't get me wrong, we love seeing you in the comments, don't stop that, but I think you would get a large number of subscribers and I think we all would benefit.
I’ve given of the order of 90 interviews. The number of people who listen to one or more of the scores of alternative platforms is in the millions.
Writing it out long form is slow going & I look at some of the more popular readerships, and don’t feel encouraged.
I dislike any form of structure, which attitude probably comes from a longish career. I struggle even to run my own life because of the dominance of this whole situation. If I had a spare hour, of the handful of things I could prioritise, sitting and writing wouldn’t score highly.
If anyone fancied creating partial or full transcripts from a selection of scores of interviews, I could get behind that!
If you’re asking for someone to listen to interviews and type it out, I could do that.
This is an important issue ( understatement),
and it sounds like you have quite the following. If you started a Substack, I could have all your interviews ready in written form for you to use. I’m not sure how to proceed from here but let me know if you’re serious. People need this information and more & more are searching here for the answers.
Thanks for doing what you’ve done. I appreciate listening to the interviews I’ve heard. I’m glad you are in Florida. I love it here, having moved ( God’s grace) from upstate New York just before lockdown started.
If I find time I will make a readable transcript of your most informative interviews. I have seen a few. I am very curious with you being at Pfizer for so long what your take on the use of snake venom peptides in pharmaceuticals is?
What about the horrid protocols? When have we ever used the same protocols for respiratory virus? No antibiotics, no early interventions, Ivermectin studies retracted from journals unnecessarily, etc. Who was in charge of the national medical protocols? They were very orchestrated from day 1. The NIH? AMA? Who has that power?
Thank you for your post above. I knew morphine wouldn’t help with breathing after being intubated. 🙈 it’s time to shine a light on all this. Thank you again.
It’s a very good question. I don’t know where the hopelessly inappropriate protocols came from.
I don’t know whether each country issued their own guidelines, probably based on a set of master guidelines.
I don’t know if the advisories to managers of care home patients were consistent with guidelines to hospital administrators.
Unfortunately, answering these questions, even if it was possible, doesn’t really take us anywhere. It’s an important detail in the crimes, but regardless of the findings, there’s no doubt that the whole world is a massive crime scene.
Thank for this dialogue and perspective. I remember two things occurring around end of December 2019. First the cruise ship where there was a respiratory infection outbreak of a large number of people. (@100+) Usually cruise ships have outbreaks of Noro gastrointestinal virus. The ship had been to China and ended up quarantined in Japan for weeks. There was one death, elderly person with comorbidities. Most persons interviewed explained symptoms as rather mild to bad cold. Then the press ramped it up as a successful quarantine of a novel virus saving the lives of hundreds. Second was a posting on UTube explaining how this was a man made questionable virus with unusually additions to a covid viral base that appeared to be AIDS like. It was a very detailed presentation but the posting web site was question enough to consider it in the realm of conspiracy. This was taken down rapidly never to be seen again.
Not long into 2020 I ran across another presentation given by an early descentor Dr. David Martin. His specialty is providing research and corporate advisory services and is an intangible asset underwriter. He researched/reviewed over 4,000 patents issued in relation to SARS Coronavirus and did comprehensive review of financing of all manipulations of the CV which gave rise to SARS as a sub-Clare of the beta CV family. There several interviews with Dr.Martin where he delivers detailed trail of damning evidence,(if I understand it clearly), which purports.....Covid-19 is actually a computer generated line of coding which is suspect with no known actual live virus obtained. This bolsters your claim there has “ever been in circulation a novel respiratory which, crucially, caused massive scale illness and deaths.”
Based on the above information and my personal 37 years in hospital work as RN, I smelled a rat. With my rather basic education on viruses and infection mitigation standards what was being shouted in media did not make sense. I was and have been appalled how so many of my colleagues so quickly bought the rhetoric and complied with all the mandates. If I had not retired in 2018 I probably would have been fired for noncompliance of all the mandates.
I applaud you and all the other physicians, scientists who bravely keep speaking the truth despite censure and other consequences you have endured for speaking out.
Thank you, Charlene! You sound like you have something about you which would have prevented you from adopting “medical care guidance” where this made no sense for the individual in front of you.
Please continue to try to warn others! That’s how we defeat the perpetrators. Nothing else can be relied upon.
Dr.Yeadon I am very vocal all the time. You’re correct, I would not have followed most of the directive given for those hospitalized. All of it was contrary to established standards of care. Sadly despite giving reference to data so many just decided keeping jobs was more important than standing up as a group with power against this tyrant,
Stand strong, keep up the good fight. Truth always prevails eventually!
Baric was, indeed, very prideful. I don't know if he was dastardly, but he seemed very "resourceful." I can see him doing an end run. Some people may have been surprised and angry.
You can use terms such as "prideful" and "resourceful" when more accurate descriptive terms would be "psychopathic" and "evil" and certainly the technology and the knowledge were there and used in GOF engineering; neither Baric nor Fauci cared about laws being broken nor did they have any regard for human life and suffering; unfortunately, and in the face of a mountain of evidence, you sound like Robert Malone when he still argues that noone he knew was smart enough to pull this scamdemic off and that there was no elitist conspiracy of nefarious actors. Sorry, but there was and is!
I agree that idiocy was involved, but planning & deliberately harmful actions were introduced from the top.
The nationwide directive, for example, to “not prescribe antibiotics in cases where a definitive diagnosis of covid19 had been made” is dangerous advice.
A positive test result in no way excludes bacterial superinfection.
It’s easy to sell to the public, because they’re familiar with being advised that they apparently have a virus and antibiotics won’t help. However, doctors know they cannot be sure that the patients don’t need antibiotics & tend to prescribe on a precautionary basis if they’ve doubts.
On vaccine injuries, they’re too complacent for doctors not to know. I believe almost all senior doctors know that the c19 vaccines are injurious.
Are you saying that all antibiotics had been reduced to 50%, or perhaps, that certain antibiotics given to some people in some hospitals were at 50% strength?
As I understand it, decisions were made not to prescribe antibiotics (of types usually effective in bacterial infections of the airways) at all, in many cases where ordinarily they would have been.
CDC/FDA guidance amplified hospital & family practise guidance, and had the effect of grossly depressing scripts.
In U.K., we don’t in this article have the breakdown of antibiotics preferred for chest infections. All we see in the gross totals is a distinct fall in summer 2020, consistent with what happened in USA.
I believe large numbers of people succumbed to bacterial pneumonia who would have survived if treated normally, that is to say, conservatively.
In my view, they’re doing they’d darnedest to make sure you regard this event EXACTLY as they want you to.
Specifically, that there WAS a novel virus (I’m not alone in originally believing that myself, but over time, I’ve seen sufficient evidence that casts severe doubt on that idea. Additionally, when considered as part of a global coup d’etat, I have put myself in the position as the seniormost, hidden perpetrators. In Q&A, they’d learn that the effects of a released, novel pathogen simply couldn’t be predicted accurately. It might burn out rapidly. Or, it might turn out to be quite a lot more lethal than they’d expected, collapsing advanced civilizations. Those top decision makers would, I submit, conclude that this natural risk is simply intolerable to them. The crave total control & the wide range of possible outcomes from a deliberate release militates against this plan of action. “No, we’re not going to do this. Come back with a plan with very much reduced uncertainty on outcomes”. The alternative that I think they’ve used is to add one more lie to the tall stack of lies which has surrounded this entire affair. The lie is that there has ever been in circulation a novel respiratory virus which, crucially, caused massive scale illness and deaths.
Instead, they simply TOLD us there was this frightening, novel pathogen & ramped up the stress-inducing fear porn to 11 & held it there. Cheating about genetic sequences, PCR test protocols (probes, primers, amplification and annealing conditions, cycles, ignoring contaminating genetic materials from not only human and claimed viral sources, but also bacterial and fungal sources. Why did they insert the sampling sticks right into our sinuses? Was it to maximise non-human genetic sequences?
Notice the soft evidence that our wondrous leaders, including Queen Elizabeth II, were happy to meet & greet one another, without testing, masking or social distancing. They had no fear. In the scenario above, a few people would known there was no new hazard in their environment. If there really was a lethal pathogen stalking the land, I don’t believe they’ve the courage to act nonchalantly and risk exposure.
Most convincingly, for me at least, is the all causes mortality data by state, sex, age & date of occurrence, as analysed by Denis Rancourt and colleagues. The patterns of increased ACM is inconsistent with the presence of a novel, respiratory virus as the main cause.
If I’m correct, what a genius move if was merely to pretend there was
They want you ONLY to consider how said virus got into the human population. Was it a natural emergence (you know, a wild, horseshoe bat bit an innocent pangolin & this ended up being sold out of a wet market in Wuhan) or was it hubristically created by a Chinese researcher, enabled, along the way, by a dastardly researcher at UNC, making an end run around a presidential pause on such work?
Then there’s the frisson on the question as to whether the arrival of this “killer virus” in the general public was down to carelessness and a lab leak, or did someone deliberately spread it?
I close by pointing out that the perpetrators have hermetic control of the mass media. That’s why they’ve found it so easy to censor people like me. If a story appears on multiple TV networks, it’s because they’re either OK with it or they actively planted it, it won’t be genuine. I don’t think they’ve told the truth since this coup began.
I believe I’ve established that the perpetrators planted the controversy about origins of SARS-CoV-2, because a little embarrassment of the establishment was a small price to pay in order to persuade most of us that there surely must be a novel virus when, in fact, there isn’t.
I have colleagues who do not believe what we’ve been told has happened is even possible technologically. I don’t have the background to be able to assess that idea. But the rest hangs together for me in a way that no other explanation does.
In closing, I’m not saying people weren’t sick or that they didn’t die in huge numbers. I’m arguing only about the causes of illnesses and deaths. They were made such & sone killed by all the pre-existing causes, amplified by fear, resulting immunosuppression & then a swath of revolting actions. They chopped antibiotic prescriptions by 50% durujg 2020. They endured very large numbers of frail elderly people were mechanically ventilated, a procedure which, in such subjects, is close to contraindicated. They were administered renal toxin, remdesivir. They were given midazolam and morphine, synergistic respiratory depressant drugs which are also all but contradicted in patients with breathing difficulties.
The main reason for the lies about the novel virus is total predictability and control, with the intention to begin dismantling modern society with lockdowns and furlough. The immediate practical goal was to inject as many people as possible with materials designed not to induce immunity, but to cause injury, maiming and death.
The chickens are coming home to roost, right now in the banking system.
As I always say, I cannot know much for sure, and this is among them. I don’t have a copy of the script. By the way, whatever it actually is, I don’t believe what they called influenza disappeared conveniently in early 2020.
Best wishes
Mike
Dear Dr. Yeadon, Many thanks for sharing your comments. I am finally settling back into a normal desk routine after months of frequent travel. As I mentioned a few months ago, I would like to interview you, and will be in touch with you directly about setting up a time. Best regards, John
An interview would be wonderful!
If you started your own substack, you would instantly have thousands of subscribers.
There are so many of us who have been saying exactly what you just said but we are unknown nobodies, we don't have the clout you have, the expertise, control over the technical language.
I came to the same conclusions because of two reasons, one, I listened to the experts who disagreed with the narrative, and two, I am an expert in history, and I am not alone, anyone with an honest take on our past smelled a rat from the get go.
We just needed people like you to fill in the blanks. Like how one can not see a black hole, only its impact on surrounding bodies, we could see that, but you can see the black hole.
Your perspective is vital. I hope you consider publishing your thoughts on your own page, and don't get me wrong, we love seeing you in the comments, don't stop that, but I think you would get a large number of subscribers and I think we all would benefit.
Thank you again for everything you have done.
I’ve given of the order of 90 interviews. The number of people who listen to one or more of the scores of alternative platforms is in the millions.
Writing it out long form is slow going & I look at some of the more popular readerships, and don’t feel encouraged.
I dislike any form of structure, which attitude probably comes from a longish career. I struggle even to run my own life because of the dominance of this whole situation. If I had a spare hour, of the handful of things I could prioritise, sitting and writing wouldn’t score highly.
If anyone fancied creating partial or full transcripts from a selection of scores of interviews, I could get behind that!
No one can argue with that, I understand.
Thank you again for everything you have contributed. History will remember you.
If you’re asking for someone to listen to interviews and type it out, I could do that.
This is an important issue ( understatement),
and it sounds like you have quite the following. If you started a Substack, I could have all your interviews ready in written form for you to use. I’m not sure how to proceed from here but let me know if you’re serious. People need this information and more & more are searching here for the answers.
I have some free time, I’d love to do this.
💌
Thanks for doing what you’ve done. I appreciate listening to the interviews I’ve heard. I’m glad you are in Florida. I love it here, having moved ( God’s grace) from upstate New York just before lockdown started.
If I find time I will make a readable transcript of your most informative interviews. I have seen a few. I am very curious with you being at Pfizer for so long what your take on the use of snake venom peptides in pharmaceuticals is?
Second that
What about the horrid protocols? When have we ever used the same protocols for respiratory virus? No antibiotics, no early interventions, Ivermectin studies retracted from journals unnecessarily, etc. Who was in charge of the national medical protocols? They were very orchestrated from day 1. The NIH? AMA? Who has that power?
Thank you for your post above. I knew morphine wouldn’t help with breathing after being intubated. 🙈 it’s time to shine a light on all this. Thank you again.
It’s a very good question. I don’t know where the hopelessly inappropriate protocols came from.
I don’t know whether each country issued their own guidelines, probably based on a set of master guidelines.
I don’t know if the advisories to managers of care home patients were consistent with guidelines to hospital administrators.
Unfortunately, answering these questions, even if it was possible, doesn’t really take us anywhere. It’s an important detail in the crimes, but regardless of the findings, there’s no doubt that the whole world is a massive crime scene.
Thank for this dialogue and perspective. I remember two things occurring around end of December 2019. First the cruise ship where there was a respiratory infection outbreak of a large number of people. (@100+) Usually cruise ships have outbreaks of Noro gastrointestinal virus. The ship had been to China and ended up quarantined in Japan for weeks. There was one death, elderly person with comorbidities. Most persons interviewed explained symptoms as rather mild to bad cold. Then the press ramped it up as a successful quarantine of a novel virus saving the lives of hundreds. Second was a posting on UTube explaining how this was a man made questionable virus with unusually additions to a covid viral base that appeared to be AIDS like. It was a very detailed presentation but the posting web site was question enough to consider it in the realm of conspiracy. This was taken down rapidly never to be seen again.
Not long into 2020 I ran across another presentation given by an early descentor Dr. David Martin. His specialty is providing research and corporate advisory services and is an intangible asset underwriter. He researched/reviewed over 4,000 patents issued in relation to SARS Coronavirus and did comprehensive review of financing of all manipulations of the CV which gave rise to SARS as a sub-Clare of the beta CV family. There several interviews with Dr.Martin where he delivers detailed trail of damning evidence,(if I understand it clearly), which purports.....Covid-19 is actually a computer generated line of coding which is suspect with no known actual live virus obtained. This bolsters your claim there has “ever been in circulation a novel respiratory which, crucially, caused massive scale illness and deaths.”
Based on the above information and my personal 37 years in hospital work as RN, I smelled a rat. With my rather basic education on viruses and infection mitigation standards what was being shouted in media did not make sense. I was and have been appalled how so many of my colleagues so quickly bought the rhetoric and complied with all the mandates. If I had not retired in 2018 I probably would have been fired for noncompliance of all the mandates.
I applaud you and all the other physicians, scientists who bravely keep speaking the truth despite censure and other consequences you have endured for speaking out.
Big THANK YOU!
Thank you, Charlene! You sound like you have something about you which would have prevented you from adopting “medical care guidance” where this made no sense for the individual in front of you.
Please continue to try to warn others! That’s how we defeat the perpetrators. Nothing else can be relied upon.
Best wishes
Mike
Dr.Yeadon I am very vocal all the time. You’re correct, I would not have followed most of the directive given for those hospitalized. All of it was contrary to established standards of care. Sadly despite giving reference to data so many just decided keeping jobs was more important than standing up as a group with power against this tyrant,
Stand strong, keep up the good fight. Truth always prevails eventually!
Dr. Mike Yeadon
Baric was, indeed, very prideful. I don't know if he was dastardly, but he seemed very "resourceful." I can see him doing an end run. Some people may have been surprised and angry.
You can use terms such as "prideful" and "resourceful" when more accurate descriptive terms would be "psychopathic" and "evil" and certainly the technology and the knowledge were there and used in GOF engineering; neither Baric nor Fauci cared about laws being broken nor did they have any regard for human life and suffering; unfortunately, and in the face of a mountain of evidence, you sound like Robert Malone when he still argues that noone he knew was smart enough to pull this scamdemic off and that there was no elitist conspiracy of nefarious actors. Sorry, but there was and is!
@ Dr. Mike (This is a classic case of not “Respecting the Science™,”) At all!
As we the peasants have been condescendingly admonished to do since 2020.
(quote taken from article about NIH)
Is it Genius or the worst kind of incompetence? I tend to think all planned quite well, but there is an argument to be made for idiocy.
I agree that idiocy was involved, but planning & deliberately harmful actions were introduced from the top.
The nationwide directive, for example, to “not prescribe antibiotics in cases where a definitive diagnosis of covid19 had been made” is dangerous advice.
A positive test result in no way excludes bacterial superinfection.
It’s easy to sell to the public, because they’re familiar with being advised that they apparently have a virus and antibiotics won’t help. However, doctors know they cannot be sure that the patients don’t need antibiotics & tend to prescribe on a precautionary basis if they’ve doubts.
On vaccine injuries, they’re too complacent for doctors not to know. I believe almost all senior doctors know that the c19 vaccines are injurious.
Dr. Mike Yeaden
Are you saying that all antibiotics had been reduced to 50%, or perhaps, that certain antibiotics given to some people in some hospitals were at 50% strength?
As I understand it, decisions were made not to prescribe antibiotics (of types usually effective in bacterial infections of the airways) at all, in many cases where ordinarily they would have been.
CDC/FDA guidance amplified hospital & family practise guidance, and had the effect of grossly depressing scripts.
In U.K., we don’t in this article have the breakdown of antibiotics preferred for chest infections. All we see in the gross totals is a distinct fall in summer 2020, consistent with what happened in USA.
I believe large numbers of people succumbed to bacterial pneumonia who would have survived if treated normally, that is to say, conservatively.
I hope that’s helpful.
Yes, it's helpful, and I think it is important to know.
Please consider reaching out to JJ Couey, PhD for his theory on this. I think he has it figured out.
https://www.twitch.tv/gigaohmbiological