You can state your own thoughts and opinions. Readers can agree or disagree. But you may not attribute ANY of them to ME. "... sorry about that." does not correct your original statement.
You can state your own thoughts and opinions. Readers can agree or disagree. But you may not attribute ANY of them to ME. "... sorry about that." does not correct your original statement.
I would be happy to edit my original reply to you, but then the readers of the thread would not know what we were referring to in the subsequent replies and that would not be fair to them and to confuse them that way.
The only way to do it properly, and to keep you happy is if you delete your replies to me and I can then go back and edit my original reply to you as well as the replies I made after. I'll leave that up to you and I'll carry out my part if you do that.
However, you diminished my correction. I didn't just say "sorry about that". What I said is:
"You are right. You didn't say that and I stand corrected. Its what happens when you comment quickly like I did, and sorry about that."
That would have been enough for pretty well anyone. There is no need for self-righteous behaviour on your part - that does not contribute to this great Substack in a helpful way that everyone on it is here for.
It really wasn't a colossal error that you make it out to be. And YOU were DISHONEST in your trying to falsely show and stated I had not corrected my error.
The problem you have is you cannot get past your own ego and arrogance. This is how the Peter Hotez's of the world are too when it comes to Covid-19 and mRNA vaccination. Most people are not like that - and are better than that.
You can state your own thoughts and opinions. Readers can agree or disagree. But you may not attribute ANY of them to ME. "... sorry about that." does not correct your original statement.
I would be happy to edit my original reply to you, but then the readers of the thread would not know what we were referring to in the subsequent replies and that would not be fair to them and to confuse them that way.
The only way to do it properly, and to keep you happy is if you delete your replies to me and I can then go back and edit my original reply to you as well as the replies I made after. I'll leave that up to you and I'll carry out my part if you do that.
However, you diminished my correction. I didn't just say "sorry about that". What I said is:
"You are right. You didn't say that and I stand corrected. Its what happens when you comment quickly like I did, and sorry about that."
That would have been enough for pretty well anyone. There is no need for self-righteous behaviour on your part - that does not contribute to this great Substack in a helpful way that everyone on it is here for.
You attributed to me a statement I did not make. That is an egregious error, which you alone own.
It really wasn't a colossal error that you make it out to be. And YOU were DISHONEST in your trying to falsely show and stated I had not corrected my error.
The problem you have is you cannot get past your own ego and arrogance. This is how the Peter Hotez's of the world are too when it comes to Covid-19 and mRNA vaccination. Most people are not like that - and are better than that.